IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v388y2025ics0306261925004386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle external cost assessment of an onshore wind farm in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Auwal Ibrahim, Hanif
  • Thopil, George Alex

Abstract

Wind power has been crucial in global energy transitions over the past decade. Such transitions are evident in sub-Saharan Africa, where South Africa is a leading player. Onshore wind power is pivotal in South Africa's energy transition, but the comprehensive external costs of the technology remain unexplored. Conducting a life cycle assessment (LCA) of a 138 MW wind farm, this study aims to fill the existing gap in the literature, by assessing greenhouse gas (GHG) and non-GHG impacts, and then converting them into costs. This study provides critical insights into the environmental, health, biodiversity, crops, and materials impact of onshore wind power, contributing towards improving the overall sustainability of offshore wind power. Findings from the study indicate that climate change impacts contribute 26.1 gCO2eq/kWh, while human health impacts emerge as the most significant non-GHG impact. The onshore wind farm's external cost ranges from 5.95 to 9.88 ZAc/kWh (2.9–4.82 €/MWh), with a median of 6.75 ZAc/kWh (3.29 €/MWh), falling within ranges observed in the literature. Climate change and human health jointly account for 89.4 % of the median external costs, primarily associated with the manufacturing and construction phases. This study underscores the importance of including external costs in the comprehensive assessment of wind power, driven by the decreasing technology costs. The findings highlight the need to incorporate climate change and human health costs to better understand the sustainability of onshore wind power across its life cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Auwal Ibrahim, Hanif & Thopil, George Alex, 2025. "Life cycle external cost assessment of an onshore wind farm in South Africa," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:388:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925004386
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925004386
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:388:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925004386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.