IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v383y2025ics030626192500056x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing urban carbon health in China's three largest urban agglomerations: Carbon emissions, energy-carbon emission efficiency and carbon sinks

Author

Listed:
  • Cai, Angzu
  • Guo, Ru
  • Zhang, Yuhao
  • Wang, Leyi
  • Lin, Ruimin
  • Wu, Haoran
  • Huang, Runyao
  • Zhang, Jing
  • Wu, Jiang

Abstract

Energy consumption is the most important source of carbon emissions in China. Research on carbon emissions is of great significance for energy transition and regional sustainable development. Urban agglomerations (UAs) in China face significant challenges, including uneven development, rising carbon emissions, and encroachment on ecological green spaces. This study introduces a novel index, Carbon Health Index (CHI), to comprehensively evaluate the interrelated dynamics within the carbon emission intensity-energy carbon emission efficiency‑carbon sink (IES) system. The term “health” in this context reflects the balance and sustainability of the carbon system, where lower carbon emission intensity (negative impact), higher energy carbon emission efficiency (positive impact), and enhanced carbon sink capacity (positive impact) indicate a more sustainable and environmentally balanced system. Taking the three largest UAs in China as a case, this study explores the interrelationships within the carbon system. The study employed a coupling index and geostatistical methods to calculate the CHI and its spatial autocorrelation over the two-decade period. Machine learning methods were then used to assess the impact of driving factors on CHI. Key findings indicate that during the study period, the carbon emission intensity of the three UAs decreased by an average of 66.11 % compared to 2000. Energy carbon emission efficiency improved, with an average growth rate of 1.42 %, while carbon sink intensity remained relatively stable. The CHI exhibited a positive growth trend, with an average annual increase of 8.22 %. Spatial analysis revealed a pattern of higher CHI values on the peripheries and lower values at the core of these UAs. The primary positive contributors to CHI were GDP and ecological carbon sink land, whereas energy consumption was a significant negative contributor. This study concludes that optimizing energy structure, enhancing ecological carbon sequestration capacity, and strengthening regional collaborative governance are essential strategies for decoupling regional carbon emissions from economic growth and improving the CHI.

Suggested Citation

  • Cai, Angzu & Guo, Ru & Zhang, Yuhao & Wang, Leyi & Lin, Ruimin & Wu, Haoran & Huang, Runyao & Zhang, Jing & Wu, Jiang, 2025. "Assessing urban carbon health in China's three largest urban agglomerations: Carbon emissions, energy-carbon emission efficiency and carbon sinks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s030626192500056x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192500056X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:383:y:2025:i:c:s030626192500056x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.