Author
Listed:
- Li, Haotian
- Wang, Jianxue
- Lu, Zelong
- Zhang, Yao
- Hou, Guo
- Xue, Lin
Abstract
Energy-intensive industries are characterized by high energy consumption and carbon emissions during production, necessitating joint control over energy and carbon. Existing research on industrial optimization typically focuses on minimizing total carbon emissions, often overlooking the average carbon emission intensity of final products, and rarely address the mitigation of industrial carbon emissions from a coordinated perspective of sources, loads and storage. As a promising approach to facilitate energy conservation and decarbonization through the coordination of these resources, the integrated source-grid-load-storage system has been paid increasing attention. This paper addresses the day-ahead scheduling problem of the industrial system with source-grid-load-storage resources. Firstly, the generalized industrial production process is modelled by using a State-Task Network (STN) representation, quantifying energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic performance in a factory. Subsequently, a day-ahead scheduling model of a factory is proposed to minimize the average cost during a production cycle, including production costs and carbon tax. This model integrates the minimization of the average carbon emission intensity of final products in the objective function and constraints total carbon emissions over the production cycle, achieving joint optimization of total carbon emissions and emission intensity. The proposed model is a mixed integer linear fractional programming (MILFP) model, which can be converted to a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model using the Charnes-Cooper transformation, enabling efficient resolution by commercial solver. Additionally, a chance-constrained information gap decision (CC-IGD) theory is adopted to cope with endogenous and exogenous stochastic factors in the real production process. Finally, case studies of electrolytic aluminum production verify the efficiency of the proposed method, demonstrating reductions in both average cost and average carbon emission intensity in industrial production, along with better risk adaptability.
Suggested Citation
Li, Haotian & Wang, Jianxue & Lu, Zelong & Zhang, Yao & Hou, Guo & Xue, Lin, 2025.
"Process analysis-based industrial production modelling with uncertainty: A linear fractional programming for joint optimization of total caron emissions and emission intensity,"
Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:appene:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0306261924025881
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.125204
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0306261924025881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.