IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v34y1989i4p261-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rival commercial means of converting refuse to energy

Author

Listed:
  • Gardner, N.
  • Probert, S.D.

Abstract

The objectives of this investigation were to: 1. (1) demonstrate the effectiveness of those refuse-disposal options which possess the facility for energy recovery: for each, an energy-audit approach has been undertaken to achieve this; and 2. (2) highlight those significant features which affect the net energy-outputs of different refuse-disposal options, whose benefits are assessed. Thus, six UK [`]waste-to-energy' facilities, which currently accept major quantities of refuse, were examined. In particular, a comparison was made between the net energy-outputs for two procedures: (i) urban incineration of refuse-derived fuel (RDF), and (ii) transferring the refuse, by rail, to a landfill site, from which appreciable quantities of landfill gas were recovered. The energy attractiveness of both incinerators and RDF plants were appreciably higher than those which could be achieved with landfills. Nevertheless, when financial costs of the various options are taken into account, environmentally acceptable landfill is often the recommended solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Gardner, N. & Probert, S.D., 1989. "Rival commercial means of converting refuse to energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 261-288.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:34:y:1989:i:4:p:261-288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0306-2619(89)90033-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:34:y:1989:i:4:p:261-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.