IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v10y1982i3p215-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting the cost of energy conservation in the residential sector: 1980-2000

Author

Listed:
  • Lakhani, Hyder G.

Abstract

This paper attempts to analyse and forecast the cost of energy conservation in the residential sector to the year 2000. It postulates that costs of conservation will increase as investors in conservation progress from the least cost conservation technologies, such as attic insulation and storm doors and windows, to heat pumps and solar water heaters. The methodology is that of regression equations and the data are costs of twenty types of capital stocks and the associated quantities of energy conserved. The regression equations of annualised cost on annualised quantities of conservation had a good fit and statistically significant coefficients so that the costs were increasing with increased conservation. The elasticity of cost with respect to conservation was 2·13 so that an increase in conservation by 1 per cent will increase its cost by more than 2 per cent. The cost-effectiveness of conservation was determined by comparing the cost of conservation per million Btu with the cost of purchasing an equivalent quantity of energy. It was concluded that energy conservation was cost-effective because the cost was only $0·84 per million Btu compared with the cost of purchasing energy, which was from two to eight times for natural gas to electricity.

Suggested Citation

  • Lakhani, Hyder G., 1982. "Forecasting the cost of energy conservation in the residential sector: 1980-2000," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 215-231, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:10:y:1982:i:3:p:215-231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0306-2619(82)90011-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jebaraj, S. & Iniyan, S., 2006. "A review of energy models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 281-311, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:10:y:1982:i:3:p:215-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.