IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v101y2013icp441-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing demand response and smart metering impacts on long-term electricity market prices and system reliability

Author

Listed:
  • Joung, Manho
  • Kim, Jinho

Abstract

This paper proposes a long-term electricity market analysis framework to assess the impacts of the demand response and smart metering infrastructure implementation on market price fluctuations and system reliability. Based on the probabilistic production cost simulation method that has been widely used in conventional power system planning, the suggested framework considers the uncertainties of the demand and the generator availability in a probabilistic manner. Furthermore, the framework considers the strategic interactions between generators (or, equivalently generation companies) and incorporates price responsive demand enabled with smart metering. To demonstrate how market equilibrium price changes and the system reliability enhances as the demand response with smart metering increases, the framework is applied to an experimental system based on the IEEE 1996 Reliability Test System (RTS) data, followed by a case study of 2010 Korean electricity markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Joung, Manho & Kim, Jinho, 2013. "Assessing demand response and smart metering impacts on long-term electricity market prices and system reliability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 441-448.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:101:y:2013:i:c:p:441-448
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261912003571
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:101:y:2013:i:c:p:441-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.