IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v435y2022ics0096300322005707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Volterra integral equations: An approach based on Lipschitz-continuity

Author

Listed:
  • Martire, Antonio Luciano

Abstract

In this study, we consider a linear Volterra integral equation of the second type whose unique unknown solution is known to be Lipschitz-continuous. Using this property, we derive a feasible, rapid, and accurate numerical algorithm. An application to risk theory is considered. More in detail in a CramȨr-Lundberg model framework, using its integro-differential representation as a starting point, we prove the ruin probability to be a Lipschitz function. Using the proposed algorithm, we evaluate the ruin probability that solves the associated Volterra integral equation. To show that the proposed framework can be reasonably generalized, we considered a wide range of claim size distributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Martire, Antonio Luciano, 2022. "Volterra integral equations: An approach based on Lipschitz-continuity," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:435:y:2022:i:c:s0096300322005707
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2022.127496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300322005707
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2022.127496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junkee Jeon & Hyeng Keun Koo & Yong Hyun Shin & Zhou Yang, 2021. "An Integral Equation Representation for Optimal Retirement Strategies in Portfolio Selection Problem," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(3), pages 885-914, October.
    2. Chadjiconstantinidis, Stathis & Xenos, Panos, 2022. "Refinements of bounds for tails of compound distributions and ruin probabilities," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 421(C).
    3. Ramsay, Colin M., 2003. "A solution to the ruin problem for Pareto distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 109-116, August.
    4. Ramsay, Colin M. & Usabel, Miguel A., 1997. "Calculating Ruin Probabilities via Product Integration," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 263-271, November.
    5. Corina D. Constantinescu & Jorge M. Ramirez & Wei R. Zhu, 2019. "An application of fractional differential equations to risk theory," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1001-1024, October.
    6. Asmussen, S. & Binswanger, K., 1997. "Simulation of Ruin Probabilities for Subexponential Claims," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 297-318, November.
    7. David J. Santana & Juan González-Hernández & Luis Rincón, 2017. "Approximation of the Ultimate Ruin Probability in the Classical Risk Model Using Erlang Mixtures," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 775-798, September.
    8. Coulibaly, Ibrahim & Lefèvre, Claude, 2008. "On a simple quasi-Monte Carlo approach for classical ultimate ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 935-942, June.
    9. In oon Kim & Bong-Gyu Jang & Kyeong Tae Kim, 2013. "A simple iterative method for the valuation of American options," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 885-895, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emilio Gómez-Déniz & José María Sarabia & Enrique Calderín-Ojeda, 2019. "Ruin Probability Functions and Severity of Ruin as a Statistical Decision Problem," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Paulsen, Jostein & Kasozi, Juma & Steigen, Andreas, 2005. "A numerical method to find the probability of ultimate ruin in the classical risk model with stochastic return on investments," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 399-420, June.
    3. Fabian Dickmann & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2014. "Faster Comparison of Stopping Times by Nested Conditional Monte Carlo," Papers 1402.0243, arXiv.org.
    4. Albrecher Hansjörg & Kantor Josef, 2002. "Simulation of ruin probabilities for risk processes of Markovian type," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 111-128, December.
    5. Peralta, Oscar & Rojas-Nandayapa, Leonardo & Xie, Wangyue & Yao, Hui, 2018. "Approximation of ruin probabilities via Erlangized scale mixtures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 136-156.
    6. Dassios, Angelos & Jang, Jiwook & Zhao, Hongbiao, 2015. "A risk model with renewal shot-noise Cox process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 55-65.
    7. Cheng Cai & Tiziano De Angelis & Jan Palczewski, 2021. "The American put with finite-time maturity and stochastic interest rate," Papers 2104.08502, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    8. Qianru Shang & Brian Byrne, 2021. "American option pricing: Optimal Lattice models and multidimensional efficiency tests," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 514-535, April.
    9. Villafuerte, L., 2023. "Solution processes for second-order linear fractional differential equations with random inhomogeneous parts," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 17-48.
    10. Fabozzi, Frank J. & Paletta, Tommaso & Stanescu, Silvia & Tunaru, Radu, 2016. "An improved method for pricing and hedging long dated American options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 656-666.
    11. Sandeep Juneja, 2001. "Importance Sampling and the Cyclic Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 900-912, December.
    12. Luis Rincón & David J. Santana, 2022. "Ruin Probability for Finite Erlang Mixture Claims Via Recurrence Sequences," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 2213-2236, September.
    13. Albrecher, Hansjörg & Kortschak, Dominik, 2009. "On ruin probability and aggregate claim representations for Pareto claim size distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 362-373, December.
    14. Albrecher, Hansjörg & Constantinescu, Corina & Loisel, Stephane, 2011. "Explicit ruin formulas for models with dependence among risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 265-270, March.
    15. Yuguang Fan & Philip S. Griffin & Ross Maller & Alexander Szimayer & Tiandong Wang, 2017. "The Effects of Largest Claim and Excess of Loss Reinsurance on a Company’s Ruin Time and Valuation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-27, January.
    16. Cheng Cai & Tiziano De Angelis & Jan Palczewski, 2022. "The American put with finite‐time maturity and stochastic interest rate," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1170-1213, October.
    17. Woo, Jae-Kyung, 2011. "Refinements of two-sided bounds for renewal equations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 189-196, March.
    18. Ramsay, Colin M., 2003. "A solution to the ruin problem for Pareto distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 109-116, August.
    19. Franck Adékambi & Kokou Essiomle, 2020. "Ruin Probability for Stochastic Flows of Financial Contract under Phase-Type Distribution," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Andreas S{o}jmark & Fabrice Wunderlich, 2023. "Functional CLTs for subordinated L\'evy models in physics, finance, and econometrics," Papers 2312.15119, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:435:y:2022:i:c:s0096300322005707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.