IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/aosoci/v8y1983i1p1-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explanatory variables of auditor performance in a large public accounting firm

Author

Listed:
  • Ferris, Kenneth R.
  • Larcker, David F.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferris, Kenneth R. & Larcker, David F., 1983. "Explanatory variables of auditor performance in a large public accounting firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:8:y:1983:i:1:p:1-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0361-3682(83)90011-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adrien Bernard Bonache, 2022. "The stressors-performance relationship in accounting and auditing firms: Is there eustress out there?," Post-Print hal-03822731, HAL.
    2. Jasmijn C. Bol & Cassandra Estep & Frank Moers & Mark E. Peecher, 2018. "The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Auditor Expertise and Human Capital Development," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 1205-1252, September.
    3. Parker, Robert J. & Kyj, Larissa, 2006. "Vertical information sharing in the budgeting process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 27-45, January.
    4. Nouri, H. & Parker, R. J., 1998. "The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 467-483.
    5. Halil Paino & Malcolm Smith & Zubaidah Ismail, 2012. "Auditor acceptance of dysfunctional behaviour," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(1), pages 37-55, May.
    6. Sweeney, John T. & Suh, Ik Seon & Dalton, Kenneth C. & Meljem, Sylvia, 2017. "Are workpaper reviews preparer-specific?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 560-577.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:8:y:1983:i:1:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/aos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.