IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/aosoci/v113y2024ics0361368224000369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seeking justice: Inequitable management compensation and employee whistleblowing

Author

Listed:
  • Evans, J. Harry
  • Ma, Mark (Shuai)
  • Yang, Yucheng (John)

Abstract

Prompted by high pay disparity within firms, many employees have raised concerns about the equity of management compensation. This study examines the relation between employees’ perceptions of inequitable management compensation and their whistleblowing behavior. We expect that when employees feel more strongly that management compensation is inequitable and unjust, they are more motivated to blow the whistle on potential management misconduct. Consistent with this expectation, we find that firms with higher CEO pay ratios are more likely to experience employee whistleblowing of alleged misconduct in the following year. This positive association is stronger when employees are more likely to perceive a high CEO pay ratio as being unjust. We also provide several tests to mitigate concerns about alternative explanations based on corporate culture or underlying fraud and to support the assumptions underlying our arguments. In addition, our results are robust to alternative measures of within-firm pay disparity. Overall, our findings identify potentially positive aspects of high pay disparity within a firm because its employees are more motivated to monitor management through whistleblowing.

Suggested Citation

  • Evans, J. Harry & Ma, Mark (Shuai) & Yang, Yucheng (John), 2024. "Seeking justice: Inequitable management compensation and employee whistleblowing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:113:y:2024:i:c:s0361368224000369
    DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2024.101576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368224000369
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.aos.2024.101576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:113:y:2024:i:c:s0361368224000369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/aos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.