IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/aosoci/v113y2024ics0361368223000120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ESG stopping effect: Do investor reactions differ across the lifespan of ESG initiatives?

Author

Listed:
  • Garavaglia, Shannon
  • Van Landuyt, Ben W.
  • White, Brian J.
  • Irwin, Julie

Abstract

In general, investors respond favorably to firms' ongoing ESG initiatives. In a series of experiments, we examine whether their reactions differ across ESG initiatives' lifespan. In particular, we predict and find evidence of an “ESG stopping effect.” Even when investors react similarly to the launch of new initiatives that are ESG-related versus non-ESG-related (i.e., general business initiatives), they react more negatively to companies stopping ESG initiatives compared to stopping general business initiatives. We further show that this more pronounced negative response to stopping ESG initiatives stems from investors' sensitivity to, and feelings of responsibility for, the undesirable ethical considerations inherent to stopping ESG initiatives. That is, ethical considerations related to a firm's initiatives loom larger for investors' judgments when initiatives are stopped compared to when they are started. Finally, we find that the ESG stopping effect is exacerbated when ESG initiatives are relatively more effective, and is reduced but not eliminated when firms provide financial justification for ending an ESG initiative.

Suggested Citation

  • Garavaglia, Shannon & Van Landuyt, Ben W. & White, Brian J. & Irwin, Julie, 2024. "The ESG stopping effect: Do investor reactions differ across the lifespan of ESG initiatives?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:113:y:2024:i:c:s0361368223000120
    DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2023.101441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368223000120
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.aos.2023.101441?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:113:y:2024:i:c:s0361368223000120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/aos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.