IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v98y2011i11p1704-1710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rainfall simulation to identify the storm-scale mechanisms of gully bank retreat

Author

Listed:
  • Chaplot, Vincent
  • Brown, Jacqueline
  • Dlamini, Phesheya
  • Eustice, Tarryn
  • Janeau, Jean-Louis
  • Jewitt, Graham
  • Lorentz, Simon
  • Martin, Lauren
  • Nontokozo-Mchunu, Charmaine
  • Oakes, Ernest
  • Podwojewski, Pascal
  • Revil, Sylvain
  • Rumpel, Cornelia
  • Zondi, Nhlakanipho

Abstract

Gully erosion is one of the main causes of soil loss in drylands. Understanding the dominant mechanisms of erosion is important to achieve effective erosion control, thus in this study our main objective was to quantify the mechanisms involved in gully bank retreat as a result of three processes, falling of entire soil aggregates, transport of soil material by splash and by water running along gully banks (runoff), during rainfall events. The study was conducted in the sloping lands of the KwaZulu-Natal province, a region that is highly affected by gully erosion. Artificial rain was applied at 60 mm h-1 for 45 min at the vertical wall of a gully bank typical to the area. The splash material was collected by using a network of 0.045 m2 buckets. The sediments in the running water were assessed by sampling the runoff collected from a microplot inserted within the base of the bank, and collecting the fallen aggregates after the rainfall simulation was complete. Results indicated that the overall erosion for the simulation was 721 g m-2 h-1. Runoff erosion proved to be the dominant mechanism and amounted to 450 g m-2 h-1, followed by splash and fall down of aggregates (about 170 g m-2 h-1). Gully bank retreat occurred at a rate of 0.55 mm h-1 and assuming that the soil bulk density is 1.3 g cm-3, this corresponds to a retreat of 8.8 mm y-1. Extrapolations to the watershed level, where about 500 m2 of gully bank are observed per hectare, would lead to an erosion rate of 4.8 t ha-1 y-1. These limited results based on a simulated storm show that the three main mechanisms (runoff, splash and fall down of aggregates) are responsible for the retreat of gully banks and that to mitigate gully erosion, appropriate measures are required to control all three mechanisms. Further research studies are needed to confirm and to scale up, both in time and space, as these data are obtained at one location and from a single artificial storm.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaplot, Vincent & Brown, Jacqueline & Dlamini, Phesheya & Eustice, Tarryn & Janeau, Jean-Louis & Jewitt, Graham & Lorentz, Simon & Martin, Lauren & Nontokozo-Mchunu, Charmaine & Oakes, Ernest & Podwo, 2011. "Rainfall simulation to identify the storm-scale mechanisms of gully bank retreat," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(11), pages 1704-1710, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:98:y:2011:i:11:p:1704-1710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377410001848
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yulei Ma & Xiangzhou Xu & Peiqing Xiao & Qiao Yan & Chao Zhao, 2021. "Geomorphic natural hazard on loess terrain: expansion on the gully sidewall," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2535-2555, December.
    2. Janeau, J.-L. & Gillard, L.-C. & Grellier, S. & Jouquet, P. & Le, Thi Phuong Quynh & Luu, Thi Nguyet Minh & Ngo, Quoc Anh & Orange, D. & Pham, Dinh Rinh & Tran, Duc Toan & Tran, Sy Hai & Trinh, Anh Du, 2014. "Soil erosion, dissolved organic carbon and nutrient losses under different land use systems in a small catchment in northern Vietnam," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 314-323.
    3. Jinzhong Xu & Hao Li & XiaoBing Liu & Wei Hu & Qingnan Yang & Yanfang Hao & Huaicai Zhen & Xingyi Zhang, 2019. "Gully Erosion Induced by Snowmelt in Northeast China: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:98:y:2011:i:11:p:1704-1710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.