IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v98y2010i1p29-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of field length and management practices on dissolved organic carbon export in furrow irrigation

Author

Listed:
  • Mailapalli, Damodhara R.
  • Wallender, Wesley W.
  • Burger, Martin
  • Horwath, William R.

Abstract

Farming practices, including tillage, cover cropping and residue management can have profound effects on the efficiency of irrigation practices. The effects of three field management practices (FMPs) standard tillage and winter-fallow (ST), standard tillage and winter-cover crop (STCC), and no-till and winter-fallow (NT) and two field lengths (122 and 366Â m) on runoff and export of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were investigated in a furrow-irrigated cropping system over two years. The residue cover was 40, 32 and 11% in 2007, and 58, 61 and 11% in 2008 for STCC, NT and ST, respectively. Furrow irrigation experiments were conducted prior to crop planting following the cover crop. The inflow was kept constant across all treatments, and infiltration and runoff were estimated using a volume balance model (VBM). The DOC concentration tended to increase with increasing field length, but did not differ among the FMPs. A threefold increase in field length increased infiltration by 40%, and decreased runoff by 60-90% and DOC export by 65-83%. In both years, infiltration was highest in STCC. In NT, infiltration was lowest in 2007, which was likely due to soil sealing, and intermediate among the three FMPs in 2008 perhaps due to the increase in residue cover in the second year. The DOC budget analysis showed that fields and FMPs acted as DOC sinks exporting less DOC than was applied in the irrigation water. The results suggest that longer furrows and STCC were greater DOC sinks compared to ST and shorter field practices. The VBM, as applied in this study to estimate infiltration and runoff, could be used to predict optimal field length to minimize runoff and promote DOC adsorption to soil within the constraints of water quality and availability and soil conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mailapalli, Damodhara R. & Wallender, Wesley W. & Burger, Martin & Horwath, William R., 2010. "Effects of field length and management practices on dissolved organic carbon export in furrow irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 29-37, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:98:y:2010:i:1:p:29-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-3774(10)00240-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. King, A.P. & Evatt, K.J. & Six, J. & Poch, R.M. & Rolston, D.E. & Hopmans, J.W., 2009. "Annual carbon and nitrogen loadings for a furrow-irrigated field," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 925-930, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mailapalli, Damodhara R. & Thompson, Anita M., 2011. "Polyacrylamide coated Milorganite™ and gypsum for controlling sediment and phosphorus loads," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 27-34.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jackson, T.M. & Hanjra, Munir A. & Khan, S. & Hafeez, M.M., 2011. "Building a climate resilient farm: A risk based approach for understanding water, energy and emissions in irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(9), pages 729-745.
    2. Wang, Wei & Wu, Xiaohong & Yin, Chunmei & Xie, Xiaoli, 2019. "Nutrition loss through surface runoff from slope lands and its implications for agricultural management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 226-231.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:98:y:2010:i:1:p:29-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.