IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v311y2025ics037837742500099x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy balance, water use efficiency, and photochemistry of two globally cultivated rainfed cactus species

Author

Listed:
  • Jardim, Alexandre Maniçoba da Rosa Ferraz
  • Morais, José Edson Florentino de
  • Tang, Xuguang
  • Souza, Luciana Sandra Bastos de
  • Souza, Carlos André Alves de
  • Santos, Wilma Roberta dos
  • Marin, Fabio Ricardo
  • Araújo Júnior, George do Nascimento
  • Alves, Cléber Pereira
  • Silva, Gabriel Italo Novaes da
  • Leite, Renan Matheus Cordeiro
  • Salvador, Kaique Renan da Silva
  • Lopes, Daniela de Carvalho
  • Steidle Neto, Antonio José
  • Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud
  • de Lima, João L.M.P.
  • Silva, Thieres George Freire da

Abstract

Linking knowledge of energy fluxes and evapotranspiration (ET) in cacti is useful for understanding plant growth, which acts as an extremely important feed source for dairy farming. However, there is little quantitative understanding of the latent (LE) and sensible (H) heat fluxes in drylands of cactus. We therefore investigated the feedback from plants of Nopalea and Opuntia on an interannual and seasonal scale, of the surface energy balance (SEB) components, morphophysiological parameters, biomass, water relations and photochemical relationships during the wet and dry seasons of 2018–2021 in the semi-arid region of Brazil. To analyse the data, four periods were selected (dry season, wet season, and dry-wet and wet-dry transitions). Our results showed that the LE (105.26 W m−2) of Opuntia was 77 % greater than that of Nopalea. In all seasons, H was the SEB component with the highest energy consumption in the two cacti, with LE the second most affected. Under Nopalea, the soil heat flux increased at the surface (112 %) during the wet and dry seasons (a mean of 1.61 MJ m−2 day−1). The mean ET of Nopalea and Opuntia was 1.71 and 1.96 mm day−1, respectively. The H/Rn ratio showed decreasing behaviour from the dry to the wet season, with a reduction of 37 % in Nopalea and 14 % in Opuntia. The NDVI ranged from 0.19 to 0.67 (Nopalea), and 0.17–0.70 for Opuntia, similar to the Chlorophyll Index, which maintained the seasonality of the NDVI. Overall, we found spatial patterns for the Photochemical Reflectance Index of −0.01 to 0.14 for Nopalea and Opuntia. Under the same conditions, Opuntia showed a higher growth rate and net assimilation rate. The mean cladode water content was 86 % in Nopalea and 89 % in Opuntia. Biomass and water use efficiency were greater in Opuntia (56.01 Mg ha−1 and 7.54 kg m−3, respectively). We also found that these comparisons indicate greater sensitivity in Nopalea, and more-significant quantification of the SEB in Opuntia.

Suggested Citation

  • Jardim, Alexandre Maniçoba da Rosa Ferraz & Morais, José Edson Florentino de & Tang, Xuguang & Souza, Luciana Sandra Bastos de & Souza, Carlos André Alves de & Santos, Wilma Roberta dos & Marin, Fabio, 2025. "Energy balance, water use efficiency, and photochemistry of two globally cultivated rainfed cactus species," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:311:y:2025:i:c:s037837742500099x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837742500099X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109385?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:311:y:2025:i:c:s037837742500099x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.