IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v307y2025ics0378377424005389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lifecycle environmental benefits of integrated rational fertilization, biochar, and constructed wetland in mitigating nutrient loading

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Yu-Ning
  • Fan, Chihhao
  • Šereš, Michal
  • Šerešová, Markéta
  • Vymazal, Jan
  • Pan, Shu-Yuan

Abstract

Agricultural activities due to fertilization contribute significantly to nutrient loadings and other environmental burdens, posing a severe threat to ecosystems. Although a portfolio of green agricultural practices is recommended, few studies address the environmental benefits from a life-cycle perspective. This study comprehensively evaluates the cradle-to-gate environmental benefits of integrating rational fertilization, biochar, and constructed wetlands (CWs) exemplified by plum cultivation. Four assessment scenarios were designed: (S1) conventional cultivation, (S2) rational fertilization with biochar amendment, (S3) conventional cultivation with a simulated CWs system, and (S4) rational fertilization with biochar amendment and a simulated CWs system. In the assessment, rational fertilization used half the fertilizer compared to conventional practices, biochar was applied at 0.1 ton/ha, and horizontal subsurface flow CWs were filled with washed gravel and planted with Phragmites australis. The findings show that rational fertilization combined with biochar (S2) or CWs (S3) alone show about half the eutrophication impacts of conventional cultivation (S1). Combining rational fertilization, biochar and CWs (S4) further reduces freshwater and marine eutrophication potentials by ∼73.5 % and ∼69.8 %, respectively. Similarly, these green agricultural practices (either S2 or S4) effectively reduce the overall endpoint impacts by about 47 %, with synergistic improvements, particularly in endpoint freshwater ecotoxicity and freshwater eutrophication, observed for S4 (a significant reduction of 76 %) compared to S1. Regarding the carbon footprint, the production of plums using conventional agriculture emits ∼300 kg CO2-eq per ton-plum, whereas using green agricultural practices results in only ∼138 kg CO2-eq per ton-plum, representing a reduction of 45.8 % in greenhouse gas emissions. This study highlights the potential of green agricultural practices to mitigate NPS nutrient loadings to aquifers and achieve sustainable agricultural management through reduced global warming and other environmental impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Yu-Ning & Fan, Chihhao & Šereš, Michal & Šerešová, Markéta & Vymazal, Jan & Pan, Shu-Yuan, 2025. "Lifecycle environmental benefits of integrated rational fertilization, biochar, and constructed wetland in mitigating nutrient loading," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:307:y:2025:i:c:s0378377424005389
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424005389
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:307:y:2025:i:c:s0378377424005389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.