IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v275y2023ics0378377422005789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental and modeling evaluation of siphon-type subsurface drainage performance in flooding and waterlogging removal

Author

Listed:
  • Ren, Xiaolei
  • Wang, Shaoli
  • Yang, Peiling
  • Tao, Yuan

Abstract

Agricultural subsurface drainage is necessary for crop production in humid, poorly drained regions with frequent rainfall. Flooding and waterlogging have become more widespread and frequent in recent years, and effective measures should be adopted to increase the subsurface drainage capacity and alleviate flooding and waterlogging disasters after short-term heavy rainfall. However, subsurface drainage focused on the layout parameters (drain depth, drain spacing, etc.) in previous studies, and these measures were limited and cumbersome in the improvement of the flow rate of subsurface drainage. Thus, we aimed to alleviate the flooding and waterlogging threats to farmland and innovatively proposed a new method to increase the flow rate of subsurface drainage, namely siphon-type subsurface drainage. The paper evaluated the performance of the siphon-type subsurface drainage by the indoor sand tank test and the HYDRUS-2D model. Three factors were considered during the experiments: conventional and improved subsurface drainage; shallow, medium, and deep drain depth; and the outlet elevation, including the outlet elevation of the drain pipe under the non-siphon drainage and the outlet elevation of the siphon pipe under the siphon drainage. The results indicated that the siphon-type subsurface drainage performed better under the conditions of steady-state ponding and ponding subsided. The flow rate of the siphon-type subsurface drainage was 27.1–45.7%, 41.8–89.8%, and 39.3–50.5% higher than that of conventional, thin-improved, and thick-improved subsurface drainage with non-siphon drainage under steady-state ponding, respectively. It also had a significant advantage when the outlet elevation was the same. The siphon-type subsurface drainage could increase the flow rate during ponding subsided and reduce the flow rate attenuation degree before the ponding disappears. The flooding removal effect of the siphon-type subsurface drainage was significantly better than that of non-siphon subsurface drainage. The water head and flow rate were used to calibrate and validate the HYDRUS-2D model. The results indicated that the simulated values of flow rate matched well with the measured ones and the relative errors were less than 10%. The influence range and absolute values of the negative water head increased with the decrease of outlet elevation, and the increase effect of flow rate increased with the decrease of the water head. The siphon-type subsurface drainage has more control distance than the non-siphon. The advantages of siphon-type subsurface drainage are not only prominent in quart sand but also applicable to field soil. The results of this study could provide technical support for the application of flooding and waterlogging removal in areas where waterlogging is prone to occur and could improve the ability of agricultural production to address waterlogging disasters.

Suggested Citation

  • Ren, Xiaolei & Wang, Shaoli & Yang, Peiling & Tao, Yuan, 2023. "Experimental and modeling evaluation of siphon-type subsurface drainage performance in flooding and waterlogging removal," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:275:y:2023:i:c:s0378377422005789
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422005789
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verma, A. K. & Gupta, S. K. & Singh, K. K. & Chauhan, H. S., 1998. "An analytical solution for design of bi-level drainage systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 75-92, June.
    2. Tao, Yuan & Wang, Shaoli & Xu, Di & Guan, Xiaoyan & Ji, Mengzhe & Liu, Jing, 2019. "Theoretical analysis and experimental verification of the improved subsurface drainage discharge with ponded water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 546-553.
    3. Hornbuckle, J.W. & Christen, E.W. & Faulkner, R.D., 2007. "Evaluating a multi-level subsurface drainage system for improved drainage water quality," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 208-216, May.
    4. Feng, Genxiang & Zhu, Chengli & Wu, Qingfeng & Wang, Ce & Zhang, Zhanyu & Mwiya, Richwell Mubita & Zhang, Li, 2021. "Evaluating the impacts of saline water irrigation on soil water-salt and summer maize yield in subsurface drainage condition using coupled HYDRUS and EPIC model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. Darzi-Naftchali, Abdullah & Karandish, Fatemeh & Šimůnek, Jiří, 2018. "Numerical modeling of soil water dynamics in subsurface drained paddies with midseason drainage or alternate wetting and drying management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 67-78.
    6. Ritzema, H.P. & Satyanarayana, T.V. & Raman, S. & Boonstra, J., 2008. "Subsurface drainage to combat waterlogging and salinity in irrigated lands in India: Lessons learned in farmers' fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 179-189, March.
    7. Haghnazari, Farzad & Karandish, Fatemeh & Darzi-Naftchali, Abdullah & Šimůnek, Jiří, 2020. "Dynamic assessment of the impacts of global warming on nitrate losses from a subsurface-drained rainfed-canola field," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    8. Tao, Yuan & Wang, Shaoli & Xu, Di & Yuan, Hongwei & Chen, Haorui, 2017. "Field and numerical experiment of an improved subsurface drainage system in Huaibei plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 24-32.
    9. Darzi-Naftchali, Abdullah & Motevali, Ali & Keikha, Mahdi, 2022. "The life cycle assessment of subsurface drainage performance under rice-canola cropping system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    10. Qian, Yingzhi & Zhu, Yan & Ye, Ming & Huang, Jiesheng & Wu, Jingwei, 2021. "Experiment and numerical simulation for designing layout parameters of subsurface drainage pipes in arid agricultural areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    11. Filipović, Vilim & Mallmann, Fábio Joel Kochem & Coquet, Yves & Šimůnek, Jirka, 2014. "Numerical simulation of water flow in tile and mole drainage systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 105-114.
    12. Tao, Yuan & Wang, Shaoli & Xu, Di & Qu, Xingye, 2016. "Experiment and analysis on flow rate of improved subsurface drainage with ponded water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-9.
    13. Turtola, E. & Paajanen, A., 1995. "Influence of improved subsurface drainage on phosphorus losses and nitrogen leaching from a heavy clay soil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 295-310, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo, Chenyao & Yao, Chenzhi & Wu, Jingwei & Qin, Shuai & Yang, Haoyu & Li, Hang & Mao, Jun, 2024. "Field and numerical experiments of subsurface drainage systems in saline and low-permeability interlayered fields in arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    2. Yasir Abduljaleel & Ahmed Awad & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Ali Salem & Abdelazim Negm & Mohamed Elsayed Gabr, 2023. "Assessment of Subsurface Drainage Strategies Using DRAINMOD Model for Sustainable Agriculture: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao, Yuan & Li, Na & Wang, Shaoli & Chen, Haorui & Guan, Xiaoyan & Ji, Mengzhe, 2021. "Simulation study on performance of nitrogen loss of an improved subsurface drainage system for one-time drainage using HYDRUS-2D," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    2. Feng, Genxiang & Zhu, Chengli & Wu, Qingfeng & Wang, Ce & Zhang, Zhanyu & Mwiya, Richwell Mubita & Zhang, Li, 2021. "Evaluating the impacts of saline water irrigation on soil water-salt and summer maize yield in subsurface drainage condition using coupled HYDRUS and EPIC model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    3. Yuhui Yang & Dongwei Li & Weixiong Huang & Xinguo Zhou & Zhaoyang Li & Xiaomei Dong & Xingpeng Wang, 2022. "Effects of Subsurface Drainage on Soil Salinity and Groundwater Table in Drip Irrigated Cotton Fields in Oasis Regions of Tarim Basin," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Liu, Yi & Hu, Yue & Wei, Chenchen & Zeng, Wenzhi & Huang, Jiesheng & Ao, Chang, 2024. "Synergistic regulation of irrigation and drainage based on crop salt tolerance and leaching threshold," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    5. Addab, Haider & Bailey, Ryan T., 2022. "Simulating the effect of subsurface tile drainage on watershed salinity using SWAT," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    6. Tao, Yuan & Wang, Shaoli & Xu, Di & Guan, Xiaoyan & Ji, Mengzhe & Liu, Jing, 2019. "Theoretical analysis and experimental verification of the improved subsurface drainage discharge with ponded water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 546-553.
    7. Qian, Yingzhi & Zhu, Yan & Ye, Ming & Huang, Jiesheng & Wu, Jingwei, 2021. "Experiment and numerical simulation for designing layout parameters of subsurface drainage pipes in arid agricultural areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    8. Guo, Chenyao & Yao, Chenzhi & Wu, Jingwei & Qin, Shuai & Yang, Haoyu & Li, Hang & Mao, Jun, 2024. "Field and numerical experiments of subsurface drainage systems in saline and low-permeability interlayered fields in arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    9. Sagar Regmi & Paul Davidson & Cody Allen, 2024. "Yield Impact of Data-Informed Surface Drainage: An On-Farm Case Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Mehdi Jafari-Talukolaee & Henk Ritzema & Abdullah Darzi-Naftchali & Ali Shahnazari, 2016. "Subsurface Drainage to Enable the Cultivation of Winter Crops in Consolidated Paddy Fields in Northern Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Singh, Ajay, 2019. "Poor-drainage-induced salinization of agricultural lands: Management through structural measures," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 457-463.
    12. Genxiang Feng & Zhanyu Zhang & Zemin Zhang, 2019. "Evaluating the Sustainable Use of Saline Water Irrigation on Soil Water-Salt Content and Grain Yield under Subsurface Drainage Condition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Darzi-Naftchali, Abdullah & Motevali, Ali & Keikha, Mahdi, 2022. "The life cycle assessment of subsurface drainage performance under rice-canola cropping system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    14. Guo, Chenyao & Jiang, Xinman & Wu, Jingwei & Qin, Shuai & He, Shuai & Yang, Haoyu & Zhang, Rui & Yao, Chenzhi, 2024. "Risk evaluation for the combined clogging of subsurface drainage envelopes in arid areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    15. Zhe Wu & Chenyao Guo & Haoyu Yang & Hang Li & Jingwei Wu, 2022. "Experimentally Based Numerical Simulation of the Influence of the Agricultural Subsurface Drainage Pipe Geometric Structure on Drainage Flow," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Tao, Yuan & Wang, Shaoli & Xu, Di & Yuan, Hongwei & Chen, Haorui, 2017. "Field and numerical experiment of an improved subsurface drainage system in Huaibei plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 24-32.
    17. Häggblom, Olle & Salo, Heidi & Turunen, Mika & Nurminen, Jyrki & Alakukku, Laura & Myllys, Merja & Koivusalo, Harri, 2019. "Impacts of supplementary drainage on the water balance of a poorly drained agricultural field," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Kacimov, A. R., 2000. "Comment on the paper "An analytical solution for design of bi-level drainage systems" by A.K. Verma, S.K. Gupta, K.K. Singh, H.S. Chauhan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 193-200, December.
    19. Abdullah Darzi-Naftchali & Henk Ritzema, 2018. "Integrating Irrigation and Drainage Management to Sustain Agriculture in Northern Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Jiang, Donglin & Ao, Chang & Bailey, Ryan T. & Zeng, Wenzhi & Huang, Jiesheng, 2022. "Simulation of water and salt transport in the Kaidu River Irrigation District using the modified SWAT-Salt," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:275:y:2023:i:c:s0378377422005789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.