IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v271y2022ics037837742200347x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Water retention and infiltration affected by conventional and conservational tillage on a maize plot; rainfall simulator and infiltrometer comparison study

Author

Listed:
  • Vlček, Lukáš
  • Šípek, Václav
  • Zelíková, Nikol
  • Čáp, Petr
  • Kincl, David
  • Vopravil, Jan

Abstract

Tillage practices have a profound influence on the propensity for overland flow formation. The hydrological behavior of nine experimental plots was investigated by means of saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and water retention analysis provided by single-ring infiltrometer (INF) and rainfall simulator (RS) infiltration measurements. The applied management practices encompassed no-tillage, reduced tillage and several forms of conventional tillage methods. Specifically, the influence of wide and narrow sowing rows and the use of cover crops were examined. Finally, the applicability of INF and RS for overland flow formation evaluation on cropped plots was compared. The reduced tillage practices resulted in the Ks and water retention increase, implying a lower propensity for overland flow formation. The Ks in the reduced tillage plots were higher by 30–50% compared to conventionally tilled and by 20% compared to no-tilled plots, respectively. The differences in water retention were less straightforward as the reduced tilled plots exhibited higher retention than conventionally tilled plots (by >20%) but lower values compared to no-tilled plots in June (by 15%). The utilization of narrow sowing rows generally resulted in higher Ks and enhanced water retention compared to wide rows. The use of cover crops in the conventionally tilled plots led to a 40% increase in Ks and a 90% increase in water retention. Hence, the use of reduced tillage, narrow sowing rows or cover crops in the conventionally tilled plots were found desirable for the mitigation of soil erosion, flash flood occurrence and sufficient groundwater recharge. Eight times higher variance of Ks using a single-ring infiltrometer compared to RS indicated the incomparability of these two methods. Therefore, the RS should be considered as a benchmark for evaluating the propensity to overland flow formation on cropped plots.

Suggested Citation

  • Vlček, Lukáš & Šípek, Václav & Zelíková, Nikol & Čáp, Petr & Kincl, David & Vopravil, Jan, 2022. "Water retention and infiltration affected by conventional and conservational tillage on a maize plot; rainfall simulator and infiltrometer comparison study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:271:y:2022:i:c:s037837742200347x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837742200347X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107800?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martinát, Stanislav & Navrátil, Josef & Dvořák, Petr & Van der Horst, Dan & Klusáček, Petr & Kunc, Josef & Frantál, Bohumil, 2016. "Where AD plants wildly grow: The spatio-temporal diffusion of agricultural biogas production in the Czech Republic," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 85-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tang, Zijun & Lu, Junsheng & Xiang, Youzhen & Shi, Hongzhao & Sun, Tao & Zhang, Wei & Wang, Han & Zhang, Xueyan & Li, Zhijun & Zhang, Fucang, 2024. "Farmland mulching and optimized irrigation increase water productivity and seed yield by regulating functional parameters of soybean (Glycine max L.) leaves," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Jan Gregar & Jan Petrů & Jana Kalibová & Věra Ürge & David Kincl & Jan Vopravil, . "Impact of intercrops on soil loss and surface runoff from sloping maize fields," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mirosław Biczkowski & Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Roman Rudnicki, 2021. "The Impact of RDP Measures on the Diversification of Agriculture and Rural Development—Seeking Additional Livelihoods: The Case of Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Josef Navrátil & Stanislav Martinát & Tomáš Krejčí & Petr Klusáček & Richard J. Hewitt, 2021. "Conversion of Post-Socialist Agricultural Premises as a Chance for Renewable Energy Production. Photovoltaics or Biogas Plants?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Tomáš Krejčí & Josef Navrátil & Stanislav Martinát & Ryan J. Frazier & Petr Klusáček & Kamil Pícha & Jaroslav Škrabal & Robert Osman, 2021. "Spatial Unevenness of Formation, Remediation and Persistence of Post-Agricultural Brownfields," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Agnieszka Urbanowska & Małgorzata Kabsch-Korbutowicz, 2021. "The Use of Flat Ceramic Membranes for Purification of the Liquid Fraction of the Digestate from Municipal Waste Biogas Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-12, July.
    5. Stanislav Martinát & Justyna Chodkowska-Miszczuk & Marián Kulla & Josef Navrátil & Petr Klusáček & Petr Dvořák & Ladislav Novotný & Tomáš Krejčí & Loránt Pregi & Jakub Trojan & Bohumil Frantál, 2022. "Best Practice Forever? Dynamics behind the Perception of Farm-Fed Anaerobic Digestion Plants in Rural Peripheries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Jan Gregar & Jan Petrů & Jana Kalibová & Věra Ürge & David Kincl & Jan Vopravil, . "Impact of intercrops on soil loss and surface runoff from sloping maize fields," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.
    7. Chodkowska-Miszczuk Justyna & Kulla Marián & Novotný Ladislav, 2017. "The role of energy policy in agricultural biogas energy production in Visegrad countries," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 35(35), pages 19-34, March.
    8. Josef Navrátil & Tomáš Krejčí & Stanislav Martinát & Kamil Pícha & Petr Klusáček & Jaroslav Škrabal & Robert Osman, 2020. "Abandonment or Regeneration and Re-Use? Factors Affecting the Usage of Farm Premises in Different Social Spaces of the Rural," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Navratil, J. & Picha, K. & Buchecker, M. & Martinat, S. & Svec, R. & Brezinova, M. & Knotek, J., 2019. "Visitors’ preferences of renewable energy options in “green” hotels," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1065-1077.
    10. Dvořák, Petr & Martinát, Stanislav & der Horst, Dan Van & Frantál, Bohumil & Turečková, Kamila, 2017. "Renewable energy investment and job creation; a cross-sectoral assessment for the Czech Republic with reference to EU benchmarks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 360-368.
    11. Chodkowska-Miszczuk, J. & Martinát, S. & van der Horst, D., 2021. "Changes in feedstocks of rural anaerobic digestion plants: External drivers towards a circular bioeconomy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    12. Klusáček, Petr & Navrátil, Josef & Martinát, Stanislav & Krejčí, Tomáš & Golubchikov, Oleg & Pícha, Kamil & Škrabal, Jaroslav & Osman, Robert, 2021. "Planning for the future of derelict farm premises: From abandonment to regeneration?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Hans Renes & Csaba Centeri & Alexandra Kruse & Zdeněk Kučera, 2019. "The Future of Traditional Landscapes: Discussions and Visions," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-12, June.
    14. Zhu, Tong & Curtis, John & Clancy, Matthew, 2019. "Promoting agricultural biogas and biomethane production: Lessons from cross-country studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:271:y:2022:i:c:s037837742200347x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.