IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v244y2021ics0378377420321405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coffee performs better than amomum as a candidate in the rubber agroforestry system: Insights from water relations

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Bin
  • Meng, Xianjing
  • Zhu, Xiai
  • Zakari, Sissou
  • Singh, Ashutosh K.
  • Bibi, Farkhanda
  • Mei, Nan
  • Song, Liang
  • Liu, Wenjie

Abstract

Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantations have been facing a double challenge of land degradation and seasonal drought in Southeast Asia. Various cash crops are recently interplanted with rubber trees to face these issues. However, the water relations between rubber trees and the intercrops remain poorly understood. This study aims to evaluate the influences of three cash intercrops, namely two herbaceous plants (Amomum villosum and Alpinia oxyphylla) and a woody beverage (Coffea arabica), on rubber water utilization through both spatial and temporal scales. We investigated the plant water-absorption dynamics, root biomass, and intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEi) throughout a whole year (2017–2018). The results showed that rubber trees (43.5 ± 2.6%) and intercrops (69.1 ± 3.2%) highly depended on soil water from the 0–20 cm depths. An interspecific water competition occurred in all the rubber-based agroforestry practices, because of their similar water source and root distribution in the vertical soil profiles. Overall, the WUEi of rubber trees was relatively higher during the dry season (δ13C: −30.79 ± 1.12‰) compared to the rainy season (δ13C: −31.65 ± 0.99‰). Coffee (C. arabica) better facilitated the soil water availability than the other intercrops, suggesting its suitability as an intercrop for rubber trees. Alpinia-oxyphylla (A. oxyphylla) played a moderate role on soil water retention. Amomum (A. villosum), however, aggravated the soil water deficit in the agroforestry practice. Given the differences in water relations to rubber trees, the introduction of woody crops rather than herbaceous crops can improve the resistance of rubber plantation to the frequent drought stress in this region.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Bin & Meng, Xianjing & Zhu, Xiai & Zakari, Sissou & Singh, Ashutosh K. & Bibi, Farkhanda & Mei, Nan & Song, Liang & Liu, Wenjie, 2021. "Coffee performs better than amomum as a candidate in the rubber agroforestry system: Insights from water relations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:244:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420321405
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420321405
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hammond, James & van Wijk, Mark T. & Smajgl, Alex & Ward, John & Pagella, Tim & Xu, Jianchu & Su, Yufang & Yi, Zhuangfang & Harrison, Rhett D., 2017. "Farm types and farmer motivations to adapt: Implications for design of sustainable agricultural interventions in the rubber plantations of South West China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Iqbal, S.M.M. & Ireland, C.R. & Rodrigo, V.H.L., 2006. "A logistic analysis of the factors determining the decision of smallholder farmers to intercrop: A case study involving rubber-tea intercropping in Sri Lanka," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 296-312, March.
    3. Wu, Junen & Zeng, Huanhuan & Chen, Chunfeng & Liu, Wenjie, 2019. "Can intercropping with the Chinese medicinal herbs change the water use of the aged rubber trees?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Zhixue & Wang, Guohui & Yang, Xianlong & Li, Zhenfeng & Shen, Yuying, 2023. "Water competition among the coexisting Platycladus orientalis, Prunus davidiana and Medicago sativa in a semi-arid agroforestry system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adelhart Toorop, Roos & Ceccarelli, Viviana & Bijarniya, Deepak & Jat, Mangi Lal & Jat, Raj Kumar & Lopez-Ridaura, Santiago & Groot, Jeroen C.J., 2020. "Using a positive deviance approach to inform farming systems redesign: A case study from Bihar, India," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Hammond, Jim & Rosenblum, Nathaniel & Breseman, Dana & Gorman, Léo & Manners, Rhys & van Wijk, Mark T. & Sibomana, Milindi & Remans, Roseline & Vanlauwe, Bernard & Schut, Marc, 2020. "Towards actionable farm typologies: Scaling adoption of agricultural inputs in Rwanda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Michel Kabirigi & Haruna Sekabira & Zhanli Sun & Frans Hermans, 2023. "The use of mobile phones and the heterogeneity of banana farmers in Rwanda," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5315-5335, June.
    4. Daxini, Amar & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Ryan, Mary & Buckley, Cathal & Barnes, Andrew P., 2018. "Factors influencing farmers' intentions to adopt nutrient management planning: accounting for heterogeneity," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276183, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Alary, V. & Nefzaoui, A. & Jemaa, M. Ben, 2007. "Promoting the adoption of natural resource management technology in arid and semi-arid areas: Modelling the impact of spineless cactus in alley cropping in Central Tunisia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 573-585, May.
    6. Ota, Liz & Herbohn, John & Gregorio, Nestor & Harrison, Steve, 2020. "Reforestation and smallholder livelihoods in the humid tropics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Shi Min & Xiaobing Wang & Shaoze Jin & Hermann Waibel & Jikun Huang, 2020. "Climate change and farmers’ perceptions: impact on rubber farming in the upper Mekong region," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 451-480, November.
    8. Kaiwen Su & Jie Ren & Jie Yang & Yilei Hou & Yali Wen, 2020. "Human-Elephant Conflicts and Villagers’ Attitudes and Knowledge in the Xishuangbanna Nature Reserve, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Komarek, Adam M. & Kwon, Hoyoung & Haile, Beliyou & Thierfelder, Christian & Mutenje, Munyaradzi J. & Azzarri, Carlo, 2019. "From plot to scale: ex-ante assessment of conservation agriculture in Zambia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 504-518.
    10. Kim, Jong-Sun & Cameron, Donald, 2013. "Typology of farm management decision-making research," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 2(2), pages 1-10, January.
    11. Marilyn A. Muñoz Mayorga & Eva Iglesias Martínez & Natalia Caldés Gómez, 2017. "Jatropha Suppliers as Contributors to the Sustainability of the Production of Bioelectricity in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Nhan, Dang K. & Phong, Le T. & Verdegem, Marc J.C. & Duong, Le T. & Bosma, Roel H. & Little, David C., 2007. "Integrated freshwater aquaculture, crop and livestock production in the Mekong delta, Vietnam: Determinants and the role of the pond," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 445-458, May.
    13. Meunier, Clémentine & Martin, Guillaume & Barnaud, Cécile & Ryschawy, Julie, 2024. "Bucking the trend: Crop farmers' motivations for reintegrating livestock," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    14. Jue Wang & Haiwei Jiang & Yuan He, 2023. "Determinants of Smallholder Farmers’ Income-Generating Activities in Rubber Monoculture Dominated Region Based on Sustainable Livelihood Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Jean-Marc Blazy & François Causeret & Jean-Louis Diman, 2011. "Conditions d’adoption de plantes de services agro-écologiques en rotation avec la banane aux Antilles," Post-Print hal-02809322, HAL.
    16. Bortamuly, Alin Borah & Goswami, Kishor, 2015. "Determinants of the adoption of modern technology in the handloom industry in Assam," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 400-409.
    17. Kabirigi, Michel & Sun, Zhanli & Hermans, Frans, 2021. "Potential of Using ICT Tools for Crop Diseases Management among Heterogenous Farmers in Rwanda," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317054, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    18. Matthew C. LaFevor, 2022. "Characterizing Agricultural Diversity with Policy-Relevant Farm Typologies in Mexico," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Min, Shi & Huang, Jikun & Waibel, Hermann & Yang, Xueqing & Cadisch, Georg, 2019. "Rubber Boom, Land Use Change and the Implications for Carbon Balances in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 57-67.
    20. Nguyen Bich Hong & Mitsuyasu Yabe, 2017. "Improvement in irrigation water use efficiency: a strategy for climate change adaptation and sustainable development of Vietnamese tea production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1247-1263, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:244:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420321405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.