IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v229y2020ics0378377419308820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nitrate removal from tile drainage water: The performance of denitrifying woodchip bioreactors amended with activated carbon and flaxseed cake

Author

Listed:
  • Povilaitis, Arvydas
  • Matikienė, Jolanta

Abstract

The performance of three (1.0 m3 volume each) pilot-scale bioreactors, with one filled with woodchips only and the other two amended (10% v/v) with activated C and flaxseed cake, respectively, was tested under field conditions for nitrate removal from tile drainage water in Lithuania. The bioreactors were monitored for a period of 1.5 y, during which the flow rate, hydraulic retention time, water T, pH, dissolved O, nitrate, nitrite, ammonium, sulfate, and chemical O demand concentrations were measured. The results showed that the average nitrate removal efficiency in the bioreactor with no additives was 40.3%, and it was 44.1% in the bioreactor with activated C additives. In the bioreactor with flaxseed cake additives, 41.2% of the N was removed. During the cold seasonal period when the inflow T varied between +1.8 °C and +10.0 °C, activated C-amended woodchips showed higher efficiency and supported higher nitrate removal rates compared to those of other fillers. The highest nitrate removal efficiency was achieved at a pH of 7.0–7.5.

Suggested Citation

  • Povilaitis, Arvydas & Matikienė, Jolanta, 2020. "Nitrate removal from tile drainage water: The performance of denitrifying woodchip bioreactors amended with activated carbon and flaxseed cake," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:229:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419308820
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419308820
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:229:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419308820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.