IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v223y2019ic28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of streambank fencing to improve microbial water quality: A review

Author

Listed:
  • Muirhead, Richard W.

Abstract

All animals require drinking water to live. However, when animals have access to streams they can impact on water quality due to direct deposition of animal faeces into the water. This brings the needs of the animal to drink into direct conflict with society’s desire to maintain values for stream health and water quality. A literature review was conducted to collate published data on the effectiveness of fencing stock out of waterways/streams to reduce faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) concentrations in streams. Eighteen suitable papers were identified. These originated from four different countries and used a range of different FIB and experimental approaches. Reported values of stream fencing effectiveness covered a large range, from zero to 96%, with a median value of 62%. Overall, the different experimental approaches did not appear to bias results. This large range in effectiveness values indicated that while we are confident that stream fencing will improve microbial water quality in streams, we have very low confidence in predicting the actual percentage reduction values that can be expected.

Suggested Citation

  • Muirhead, Richard W., 2019. "The effectiveness of streambank fencing to improve microbial water quality: A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:223:y:2019:i:c:28
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419305839
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vidon, Philippe & Campbell, Marie A. & Gray, Mark, 2008. "Unrestricted cattle access to streams and water quality in till landscape of the Midwest," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 322-330, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanan Tadele Dessalegn & Alex Bolding & Charlotte de Fraiture & Mekonen Ayana, 2021. "Livestock and Small-Scale Irrigation Scheme Interactions as a Key Source for Sedimentation during the Irrigation Season: Four Case Studies from South-West Shoa, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Miller, J. & Chanasyk, D. & Curtis, T. & Entz, T. & Willms, W., 2010. "Influence of streambank fencing with a cattle crossing on riparian health and water quality of the Lower Little Bow River in Southern Alberta, Canada," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 247-258, February.
    3. Hughes, Andrew O. & Tanner, Chris C. & McKergow, Lucy A. & Sukias, James P.S., 2016. "Unrestricted dairy cattle grazing of a pastoral headwater wetland and its effect on water quality," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 72-81.
    4. Horak, Cristina Natalia & Assef, Yanina Andrea & Miserendino, María Laura, 2019. "Assessing effects of confined animal production systems on water quality, ecological integrity, and macroinvertebrates at small piedmont streams (Patagonia, Argentina)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 242-253.
    5. Miller, J. & Chanasyk, D. & Curtis, T. & Entz, T. & Willms, W., 2011. "Environmental quality of Lower Little Bow River and riparian zone along an unfenced reach with off-stream watering," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(10), pages 1505-1515, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:223:y:2019:i:c:28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.