IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v162y2015icp1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancement of nitrate removal in constructed wetlands utilizing a combined autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification technology for treating hydroponic wastewater containing high nitrate and low organic carbon concentrations

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Jong-Hwan
  • Kim, Seong-Heon
  • Delaune, Ronald D.
  • Cho, Ju-Sik
  • Heo, Jong-Soo
  • Ok, Yong Sik
  • Seo, Dong-Cheol

Abstract

To enhance the nitrate removal in constructed wetlands (CWs) for treating hydroponic wastewater discharged from greenhouses, the effectiveness of HF (horizontal flow)-HF hybrid CWs utilizing a combined sulfur-based autotrophic (based on the optimum conditions from batch experiment) and heterotrophic denitrification was evaluated for treating hydroponic wastewater containing high nitrate and low organic carbon concentrations. The optimum ratio of sulfur: limestone:immobilized bead with Thiobacillus denitrificans (T. denitrificans) was found to be 3:1:4; the optimum initial cell density was above 1×106cells; the optimum temperature was 25–35°C; and the optimum sulfur sources were thiosulfate and elemental sulfur to effectively treat hydroponic wastewater utilizing autotrophic denitrification with T. denitrificans in batch experiments. In the HF–HF CWs utilizing the combined autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification, the average removal efficiencies of nitrate were higher in the order of T2 (71.5%, thiosulfate treatment—combination of heterotrophic and autotrophic denitrification) >T3 (66.6%, element sulfur treatment—combination of heterotrophic and autotrophic denitrification) ≫T1 (43.0%, control—heterotrophic denitrification only). In the HF–HF CWs, the maximum nitrate removal efficiency by the thiosulfate treatment was slightly greater than that by the treatment with elemental sulfur, whereas the sulfate production influence on autotrophic denitrification by elemental sulfur (SO42−: 89.1mgL−1) was lower as compared to thiosulfate (SO42−: 38.3mgL−1). Because the sulfate production is an important factor to meet acceptable drinking water quality discharge standard (Sulfate concentration in the effluent was below 250 in US EPA, and 200mgL−1 in South Korea), elemental sulfur was a more suitable sulfur source in HF–HF hybrid CWs. Overall, a combined process of using E/L/B (element sulfur/limestone/immobilized bead with T. denitrificans) column in HF–HF hybrid CWs would promote autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification. Therefore, a combined autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification process in HF–HF CWs would be more suitable than the heterotrophic denitrification alone (conventional technology in CWs) for treating nitrate in hydroponic wastewater since hydroponic wastewater contains little organic carbon.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Jong-Hwan & Kim, Seong-Heon & Delaune, Ronald D. & Cho, Ju-Sik & Heo, Jong-Soo & Ok, Yong Sik & Seo, Dong-Cheol, 2015. "Enhancement of nitrate removal in constructed wetlands utilizing a combined autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification technology for treating hydroponic wastewater containing high nitrate and low ," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:162:y:2015:i:c:p:1-14
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.08.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377415300676
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.08.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tao Zheng & Xiaohu Lin & Jingcheng Xu & Jie Ren & Danyan Sun & Yunhui Gu & Juwen Huang, 2021. "Enhanced Nitrogen Removal of Steel Rolling Wastewater by Constructed Wetland Combined with Sulfur Autotrophic Denitrification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Qianyu Hang & Haiyan Wang & Zan He & Weiyang Dong & Zhaosheng Chu & Yu Ling & Guokai Yan & Yang Chang & Congyu Li, 2020. "Hydrilla verticillata –Sulfur-Based Heterotrophic and Autotrophic Denitrification Process for Nitrate-Rich Agricultural Runoff Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Cáceres, Rafaela & Pol, Enric & Narváez, Lola & Puerta, Anna & Marfà, Oriol, 2017. "Web app for real-time monitoring of the performance of constructed wetlands treating horticultural leachates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 177-185.
    4. Joanna Rodziewicz & Artur Mielcarek & Wojciech Janczukowicz & Jorge Manuel Rodrigues Tavares & Krzysztof Jóźwiakowski, 2023. "Characteristics of Sludge from the Treatment of Soilless Plant Cultivation Wastewater in a Rotating Electrobiological Disc Contactor (REBDC)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:162:y:2015:i:c:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.