IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v98y2008i2p95-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transformation toward agricultural sustainability in New Zealand hill country pastoral landscapes

Author

Listed:
  • Dodd, M.B.
  • Wedderburn, M.E.
  • Parminter, T.G.
  • Thorrold, B.S.
  • Quinn, J.M.

Abstract

A multi-stakeholder representative group was established to oversee a project examining the economic and environmental performance of a representative North Island hill country catchment farm at Whatawhata in the western Waikato region of New Zealand. The group included representation from landowners, government agencies and scientists. The group was facilitated through an action research approach incorporating three phases: (1) awareness; (2) forecasting; and (3) implementation. The group identified a set of goals and indicators relevant to achieving a "well managed rural hill catchment" The indicators were used to (a) assess the current state of the catchment farm in relation to the goals; (b) evaluate a range of strategies for improving system performance and (c) evaluate progress toward the goals following land use changes implemented within the catchment farm. Key issues for the group included the availability of data and the setting of appropriate performance benchmarks. From both economic and environmental points of view, the existing farm system was failing to meet the goals set by the management group. Key factors driving these outcomes included the physical and productivity limitations of the soil resource, poor livestock performance and poor water quality. A mixture of research observations, decision support models and expert stakeholder knowledge indicated scope for improving performance through forestry, riparian management, erosion control and livestock intensification options. Based on their evaluation of the forecasting results, the group developed a new land use plan, which depended on significant capital investment in land use and enterprise change. Subsequent monitoring of soils, vegetation, water quality, animal production and financial results over four years showed marked improvement in a number of key performance indicators. In particular, sediment and phosphorus loads and faecal coliform levels decreased rapidly, native forest fragments showed early signs of restoration, lamb and beef productivity increased and the per hectare financial returns of the pastoral component increased. Better matching of land use to land capability has led to short-term improvement in some aspects of the economic and environmental performance of the catchment farm. Progress toward a more sustainable agricultural system was achieved, but at a substantial cost for transformation of the biophysical system, which has implications for the wider sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Dodd, M.B. & Wedderburn, M.E. & Parminter, T.G. & Thorrold, B.S. & Quinn, J.M., 2008. "Transformation toward agricultural sustainability in New Zealand hill country pastoral landscapes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 95-107, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:98:y:2008:i:2:p:95-107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-521X(08)00044-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert D. Keall, 2000. "New Zealand," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 417-438, November.
    2. German, L. & Mansoor, Hussein & Alemu, Getachew & Mazengia, Waga & Amede, T. & Stroud, A., 2007. "Participatory integrated watershed management: Evolution of concepts and methods in an ecoregional program of the eastern African highlands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 189-204, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Duy X. Tran & Diane Pearson & Alan Palmer & David Gray, 2020. "Developing a Landscape Design Approach for the Sustainable Land Management of Hill Country Farms in New Zealand," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-29, June.
    2. van den Belt, Marjan & Blake, Daniella, 2014. "Ecosystem services in new Zealand agro-ecosystems: A literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 115-132.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Motilal Ghimire & Niroj Timalsina & Wei Zhao, 2024. "A Geographical approach of watershed prioritization in the Himalayas: a case study in the middle mountain district of Nepal," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 23527-23560, September.
    2. Nigussie, Zerihun & Tsunekawa, Atsushi & Haregeweyn, Nigussie & Adgo, Enyew & Cochrane, Logan & Floquet, Anne & Abele, Steffen, 2018. "Applying Ostrom’s institutional analysis and development framework to soil and water conservation activities in north-western Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Pamela Kaval & Richard Yao & Frank Scrimgeour, 2009. "The Economic Value of Biodiversity in New Zealand: Results from a Household Survey," Working Papers in Economics 09/05, University of Waikato.
    4. Arthur Grimes & James Rolfe, 2002. "Optimal defence structure for a small country," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 271-286.
    5. Popovici, Ruxandra & Erwin, Anna & Ma, Zhao & Prokopy, Linda S. & Zanotti, Laura & Bocardo Delgado, Edwin Fredy & Pinto Cáceres, José Porfirio & Zeballos Zeballos, Eliseo & Salas O’Brien, Emma Patrici, 2021. "Outsourcing governance in Peru’s integrated water resources management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:98:y:2008:i:2:p:95-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.