IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v171y2019icp13-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil carbon saturation, productivity, and carbon and nitrogen cycling in crop-pasture rotations

Author

Listed:
  • Pravia, M. Virginia
  • Kemanian, Armen R.
  • Terra, José A.
  • Shi, Yuning
  • Macedo, Ignacio
  • Goslee, Sarah

Abstract

Agricultural systems integrating perennial grass-legume pastures in rotation with grain crops sustain high crop yields while preserving soil organic carbon (Cs) with low nitrogen (N) fertilizer inputs. We hypothesize that Cs saturation in the topsoil may explain the favorable C and N cycling in these systems. We tested this hypothesis by evaluating and simulating three contrasting crop and pasture rotational systems from a 20-year no-till experiment in Treinta y Tres, Uruguay. The systems were: 1) Continuous annual cropping (CC); 2) crop-pasture rotation with two years of crops and four years of pastures (CP); and 3) perennial pasture (PP). Using the Cycles agroecosystems model, we evaluated the inclusion or exclusion of a Cs saturation algorithm. The model simulated forage, soybean, and sorghum grain yields correctly, with low root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.5, 0.7 and 1.0 Mg ha−1, respectively. Measurements show Cs accretion and Cs decline for the first and second half of the experiment, respectively. The Cs accretion rate was highest for PP, while the Cs decline was highest for CC (1.3 vs −0.6 Mg ha−1 y−1 of C). The model captured this Cs dynamics and performed better when using the Cs saturation algorithm than when excluding it (RMSE 4.7 vs 6.8 Mg C ha−1 and relative RMSE of 14% and 21% for the top 15-cm). The model with saturation simulated subsoil Cs distribution with depth well, and simulated faster N turnover and greater N availability for the subsequent grain crop in CP vs CC. The results suggest that Cs saturation, and by extension soil organic N saturation, underpin the sustainability of crop-pasture rotations, and that modeling Cs saturation dynamics can be critical to reliably simulate complex crop-pasture rotational systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Pravia, M. Virginia & Kemanian, Armen R. & Terra, José A. & Shi, Yuning & Macedo, Ignacio & Goslee, Sarah, 2019. "Soil carbon saturation, productivity, and carbon and nitrogen cycling in crop-pasture rotations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 13-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:171:y:2019:i:c:p:13-22
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.11.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X17311988
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.11.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kemanian, Armen R. & Julich, Stefan & Manoranjan, Valipuram S. & Arnold, Jeffrey R., 2011. "Integrating soil carbon cycling with that of nitrogen and phosphorus in the watershed model SWAT: Theory and model testing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(12), pages 1913-1921.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McConnell, Curt A. & Rozum, Rachel K.N. & Shi, Yuning & Kemanian, Armen R., 2023. "Tradeoffs when interseeding cover crops into corn across the Chesapeake Bay watershed," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramcharan, Amanda M. & Richard, Tom L., 2017. "Carbon and nitrogen environmental trade-offs of winter rye cellulosic biomass in the Chesapeake Watershed," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 85-94.
    2. Amin, M.G. Mostofa & Karsten, Heather D. & Veith, Tamie L. & Beegle, Douglas B. & Kleinman, Peter J., 2018. "Conservation dairy farming impact on water quality in a karst watershed in northeastern US," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 187-196.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:171:y:2019:i:c:p:13-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.