IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/edt/aucspp/v46y2024i2p177-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating The Content Validity Of The Algerian English Baccalaureate Examination

Author

Listed:
  • Djedda TAKOUACHET

    (University of El Oued, Algeria)

  • Mohammed NAOUA

    (University of El Oued, Algeria)

Abstract

In large-scale testing, validity stands out as a cornerstone in developing and evaluating tests. This is because it helps in designing tests that yield meaningful results. In this respect, this study seeks to examine whether the English tests of the BAC examination assessed the content that test designers intended to assess. To achieve so, the present article employs a descriptive content analysis, following Bachman and Palmer’s model of test usefulness. The data are analysed through curriculum mapping to compare test tasks against learning objectives. Importantly, the obtained results have revealed partial content validity as the exam aligns adequately with the curriculum content. The findings highlight key strengths and gaps in the test’s design. Thus, a list of recommendations are offered to strengthen the two validities in the English Baccalaureate tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Djedda TAKOUACHET & Mohammed NAOUA, 2024. "Evaluating The Content Validity Of The Algerian English Baccalaureate Examination," Annals of the University of Craiova, Series Psychology, Pedagogy, Teacher Training Department, University of Craiova, vol. 46(2), pages 177-187, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:edt:aucspp:v:46:y:2024:i:2:p:177-187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://aucpp.ro/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/13.-TAKOUACHET_D_NAOUA_M_AUC_PP_2024_no_46_issue_2_pp_177-187.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Baccalaureate English tests; Content validity; Scientific streams; Validation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edt:aucspp:v:46:y:2024:i:2:p:177-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan Valeriu Voinea (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/DPPD/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.