IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/edr/sswrgl/v1y2017i1p58-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Cohesion Policy Of The European Union: Alternative Funding Mechanisms Of The Romanian Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Dumitru Beldiman

    (University of Craiova, Romania)

  • Oana Maria Stepan

    (University of Craiova, Romania)

Abstract

Along with the internal market, as well with the Economic and Monetary Union, the economic and social cohesion is one of the main objectives of the European Union under the Treaty of Maastricht, respectively, to “promote social and economic progress and a high level of employability and the to achieve a balanced and sustainable development...” (Treaty on European Union - the Maastricht Treaty - 1992). In other words, economic and social cohesion would require the European Union population not to be disadvantaged, regardless of the region in which are living and/or working. This will depend very much on how it will be implemented, the cohesion policy by the European Union in cooperation with each Member State individually. This is the practical process of eliminating or at least reducing disparities in economic and social development of some Member States and/or their regions. European Union cohesion policy has three major dimensions: economic, social and territorial dimension size. The third dimension, size ”territorial” (Lisbon Treaty 2007) was introduced by the Lisbon Treaty and refers to the recognition of territorial diversity and the need to build on this diversity to generate development. Thus, it can be said that, currently, the main purpose of the cohesion policy of the European Union is represented by alleviating economic disparity, social and territorial cohesion. As regards, the cohesion policy, which are used to achieve its objective, namely to reduce disparity and strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion can say that they are the Structural Funds and the European Investment. These structural and investment funds practically represent true alternative of funding mechanisms in the economy of a Member State, with a number of advantages over traditional financing mechanisms. To those mentioned above in this article, the authors have proposed to emphasize the cohesion policy and their role as alternative funding mechanisms of the Romanian economy and their trends in 2014- 2020.

Suggested Citation

  • Dumitru Beldiman & Oana Maria Stepan, 2017. "The Cohesion Policy Of The European Union: Alternative Funding Mechanisms Of The Romanian Economy," Sociology and Social Work Review, International Society for projects in Education and Research, vol. 1(1), pages 58-67, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:edr:sswrgl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:58-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://globalresearchpublishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/The-cohesion-policy-of-the-European-Union.-Alternative-funding-mechanisms-of-the-Romanian-economy.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandra Porumbescu, 2018. "The European Institutional Actors In Handling Migration," Sociology and Social Work Review, International Society for projects in Education and Research, vol. 2(1), pages 41-48, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cohesion policy; European funds; regional development; cohesion policy instruments; economy; alternative funding mechanisms.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations
    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edr:sswrgl:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:58-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serban Ionut (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ispedur.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.