IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecr/col070/10626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Best practices, policy convergence and the WTO trade-related investment measures

Author

Listed:
  • Sercovich, Francisco

Abstract

International experience shows that cost­free replication and adoption of industrial best practices on a universal basis is a misconception. Rather, it is a matter of a progressive and reciprocal adaptation between external and local practices in which learning costs and times, as well as the need for public and private cooperation, are essential. The potential for convergence of policies, practices and institutions triggered by globalization appears to be greater at the macroeconomic than at the microeconomic level. This article examines such issues in a general way and then focuses on the dilemmas facing the countries of the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN); and other developing countries of Asia in complying with the World Trade Organization's Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs); by the year 2000. This experience is of special relevance to other developing regions -Latin America and the Caribbean in particular-, since the inertia to be overcome in the race against time to reconcile those commitments with national development objectives raises doubts as to whether these standards can be met before 2010.

Suggested Citation

  • Sercovich, Francisco, 1998. "Best practices, policy convergence and the WTO trade-related investment measures," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col070:10626
    Note: Includes bibliography
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/10626
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandwip Kumar Das & Manoj Pant, 2006. "Incentives for Attracting FDI in South Asia," International Studies, , vol. 43(1), pages 1-32, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col070:10626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.