IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ3/2017-01-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Customer Satisfaction towards Islamic and Conventional Banking: An Empirical Study from Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Fayaz Ahmad Lone

    (College of Business Administration, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia,)

  • Ebraheem Mohamad Aldawood

    (College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ulfat Rashid Bhat

    (College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia.)

Abstract

Islamic banking is gradually emerging everywhere in the world. Half a century ago, Islamic banking was just a concept contained in books only, but today it is a success story not only in Muslim countries of Middle East but even in the UK and the USA. As customer satisfaction is the compulsory element of every kind of business so Islamic banking also has to pay more attention towards customer satisfaction. Modern banking system of Saudi Arabia is unique due to political and technological environment of this country. Both conventional and Islamic banks are working together in this country to maximize the customer satisfaction and profit margin. Customers have a choice to switch either type of banking (Islamic to conventional or conventional to Islamic); this has created a challenge for banks. To retain and attract the customers, banks have to adopt different services and strategies. In the present study, the level of customer satisfaction in both conventional and Islamic banks is measured through comparative study. Data were collected through a well-designed questionnaire on Likert’s five point scale from both Islamic and conventional banks of Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from four regions (Riyadh, Dammam, Makkah and Madinah) with the intention to represent the whole Saudi Arabia. After using independent samples t-test and one-way ANOVA, it has been found that customers are equally satisfied with both types of banks and also no difference of customer satisfaction was found from different regions. This is a good sign for Islamic banking as it is competing with a conventional banking system which has its long history. At the end suggestions for developing Islamic banking in Saudi Arabia were presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Fayaz Ahmad Lone & Ebraheem Mohamad Aldawood & Ulfat Rashid Bhat, 2017. "Comparative Analysis of Customer Satisfaction towards Islamic and Conventional Banking: An Empirical Study from Saudi Arabia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 273-280.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2017-01-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/download/3775/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/3775/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eid Sharidah Musad Alanazi & Fayaz Ahmad Lone, 2016. "Social Satisfaction towards Islamic Banking in Saudi Arabia: A Survey," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 182-190, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wesal M. Aldarabseh, 2019. "The Interest in Islamic Finance Contracts in Saudi Arabia as Viewed by Google Trends," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Islamic Banking; Saudi Arabia; Customer Satisfaction; Conventional and Islamic Banking; ANOVA;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2017-01-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.