IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2021-03-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crisis of Survival of Thermal Power Plants in India due to Consistently Falling Capacity Utilization Factors Responsible and Future Outlook

Author

Listed:
  • Alok K. Tripathi

    (Additional General Manager and Sr. Faculty, NTPC Regional Learning Institute, Sipat, Bilapsur, Chhattisgarh, India.)

Abstract

Thermal power plants in India are facing unprecedented crisis. Their capacity utilization (known as Plant Load Factor, PLF) has been consistently falling over the years. In the year 2019-2020 the national average PLF stood at 55.4%, down from 78.6% in 2007-2008. It is predicted that the national average PLF may fall to 48% by 2022. Many new thermal power plants, set up with substantial capital investment are staring at a bleak future. It is an irony that on one hand, the country is power deficit and on the other hand, a large amount of new, efficient and low-carbon- footprint thermal power remains grossly unutilised. Since considerable investment has gone into these thermal power assets, the falling PLF is a matter of concern for all the key stakeholders including the power producers, lenders, regulators and consumers. This paper identifies eleven major factors responsible for this situation and discusses future outlook of these factors. We find that urgent review of fresh thermal capacity addition, immediate phasing out of old inefficient plants and policy support to enable flexible operation of the thermal power generators are imperative to save the sector from imminent collapse.

Suggested Citation

  • Alok K. Tripathi, 2021. "Crisis of Survival of Thermal Power Plants in India due to Consistently Falling Capacity Utilization Factors Responsible and Future Outlook," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 328-337.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2021-03-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/10965/5824
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/10965/5824
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shengli Liao & Zhifu Li & Gang Li & Jiayang Wang & Xinyu Wu, 2015. "Modeling and Optimization of the Medium-Term Units Commitment of Thermal Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Peng Wang & Meng Li, 2019. "Scenario Analysis in the Electric Power Industry under the Implementation of the Electricity Market Reform and a Carbon Policy in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ireneusz Górowski & Bartosz Kurek & Marek Szarucki, 2022. "The Impact of a New Accounting Standard on Assets, Liabilities and Leverage of Companies: Evidence from Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Yan & Feng, Tian-tian & Liu, Li-li & Zhang, Meng-xi, 2023. "How do the electricity market and carbon market interact and achieve integrated development?--A bibliometric-based review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    2. Zhang, Hongyu & Zhang, Da & Zhang, Xiliang, 2023. "The role of output-based emission trading system in the decarbonization of China's power sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Zheng, Xuemei & Menezes, Flavio & Nepal, Rabindra, 2021. "In between the state and the market: An empirical assessment of the early achievements of China's 2015 electricity reform," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Zhang, Hongyu & Zhang, Da & Guo, Siyue & Zhang, Xiliang, 2024. "Impact of benchmark tightening design under output-based ETS on China's power sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    5. Marc Dijk & Paula Kivimaa, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Issue: Policy for Low-Carbon Transformations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-6, September.
    6. Ying-Yi Hong, 2016. "Electric Power Systems Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-4, October.
    7. Feng, Zhong-kai & Niu, Wen-jing & Wang, Wen-chuan & Zhou, Jian-zhong & Cheng, Chun-tian, 2019. "A mixed integer linear programming model for unit commitment of thermal plants with peak shaving operation aspect in regional power grid lack of flexible hydropower energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 618-629.
    8. Guoliang Zhang & Suhua Lou & Yaowu Wu & Yang Wu & Xiangfeng Wen, 2020. "A New Commerce Operation Model for Integrated Energy System Containing the Utilization of Bio-Natural Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Zhang, Xiaodong & Patino-Echeverri, Dalia & Li, Mingquan & Wu, Libo, 2022. "A review of publicly available data sources for models to study renewables integration in China's power system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    10. Shengli Liao & Hongye Zhao & Gang Li & Benxi Liu, 2019. "Short-Term Load Dispatching Method for a Diversion Hydropower Plant with Multiple Turbines in One Tunnel Using a Two-Stage Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Gang Wang & Daihai You & Suhua Lou & Zhe Zhang & Li Dai, 2017. "Economic Valuation of Low-Load Operation with Auxiliary Firing of Coal-Fired Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Thermal Power; Energy Economics; Plant Load Factor; Coal; Renewable; Flexible Operation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q43 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy and the Macroeconomy
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2021-03-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.