IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2020-06-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Environmental and Social Disclosure on Earnings Persistence

Author

Listed:
  • Thai Van Ha

    (National Academy of Education Management, Phan Dinh Giot, Thanh Xuan, Ha Noi, Vietnam,)

  • Amena Sibghatullah

    (College of Management Sciences PAF-KIET University, Pakistan,)

  • Sang Soo Chae

    (Department of Economics and Statistics, Korea University, South Korea,)

  • Talla M. Aldeehani

    (College of business administration, Kuwait University, Kuwait)

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between environmental and social disclosure with earnings persistence as a proxy of earnings quality. This research is based on the secondary data obtained from the final reports of the listed firms of Malaysia. The empirical analysis applied on 136 listed firms of Bursa Malaysia throughout 2011 to 2018 with the observation of 1088. The measure of earnings persistence is derived from the panel data based on the regression of the time series model. The results of our study indicate that environmental and social disclosures are positively correlated with earnings persistence. This means that the more the level of commitment a firm shows with environmental and social responsibility, the more persistent earnings it carries. Moreover, earnings persistence is the proxy of earnings quality, and it is desirable by every investor.

Suggested Citation

  • Thai Van Ha & Amena Sibghatullah & Sang Soo Chae & Talla M. Aldeehani, 2020. "The Impact of Environmental and Social Disclosure on Earnings Persistence," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 690-696.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2020-06-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/10625/5530
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/10625/5530
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Artikis, Panagiotis G. & Papanastasopoulos, Georgios A., 2016. "Implications of the cash component of earnings for earnings persistence and stock returns," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 117-133.
    2. Helen Brown-Liburd & Jeffrey Cohen & Valentina L. Zamora, 2018. "CSR Disclosure Items Used as Fairness Heuristics in the Investment Decision," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 275-289, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parvez Alam Khan & Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Shireenjit K. Johl, 2021. "Does adoption of ISO 56002‐2019 and green innovation reporting enhance the firm sustainable development goal performance? An emerging paradigm," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2922-2936, November.
    2. Ailing Xu & Yuanyuan Su & Yingxin Wang, 2024. "A Study of the Impact Mechanism of Corporate ESG Performance on Surplus Persistence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sumiyana Sumiyana & Ainun Na’im & Albertus H. L. Nugroho & Firdaus Kurniawan, 2023. "Multiple measurements of CEOs’ overconfidence and future earnings management: evidence from Asia-Pacific developing countries," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. D'Mello, Ranjan & Kwon, Sungjoung & Toscano, Francesca, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility and the executive-employee pay disparity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Ni, Yensen & Huang, Paoyu & Chiang, Pinhui & Liao, Yulu, 2019. "Cash flow statements and firm value: Evidence from Taiwan," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 280-290.
    4. Maria Misiuda & Maik Lachmann, 2022. "Investors’ Perceptions of Sustainability Reporting—A Review of the Experimental Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Wesley Friske & Seth A. Hoelscher & Atanas Nik Nikolov, 2023. "The impact of voluntary sustainability reporting on firm value: Insights from signaling theory," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 372-392, March.
    6. Ye Chen & Naiding Yang, 2023. "Investor Responses to Corporate Donation Frequency Strategies: The Mediating Roles of Bidirectional Motive Attributions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Vassilios‐Christos Naoum & Georgios A. Papanastasopoulos, 2021. "The implications of cash flows for future earnings and stock returns within profit and loss firms," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 2927-2945, April.
    8. Austin, Chelsea Rae & Bobek, Donna D. & Harris, Ling L., 2021. "Does information about gender pay matter to investors? An experimental investigation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Marian Siminica & Mirela Cristea & Mirela Sichigea & Gratiela Georgiana Noja & Ion Anghel, 2019. "Well-Governed Sustainability and Financial Performance: A New Integrative Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Anthony C. Bucaro & Kevin E. Jackson & Jeremy B. Lill, 2020. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility Measures on Investors' Judgments When Integrated in a Financial Report Versus Presented in a Separate Report," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 665-695, June.
    11. William D. Brink & Karen De Meyst & Tim V. Eaton, 2022. "The Impact of Human Rights Reporting and Presentation Formats on Non-Professional Investors’ Perceptions and Intentions to Invest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Steven F. Cahan & Seokjoo Chang & Wei Z. Siqueira & Kinsun Tam, 2022. "The roles of XBRL and processed XBRL in 10‐K readability," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1-2), pages 33-68, January.
    13. Dr. Alireza Momeni & Amin Gholami* & Azam Pezhvan, 2018. "Investigating Relationship between Accruals, Cash Flow and Profitability with Stock Return in Firms Accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange," International Journal of Economics and Financial Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 4(9), pages 284-291, 09-2018.
    14. Roszkowska-Menkes, Maria & Aluchna, Maria & Kamiński, Bogumił, 2024. "True transparency or mere decoupling? The study of selective disclosure in sustainability reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Lei Dong & Bernard Wong‐On‐Wing, 2021. "Does causally linking nonfinancial measures influence investors' use of management’s disclosures of nonfinancial information?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2269-2299, April.
    16. Omar. A. Alghamdi & Gomaa Agag, 2023. "Unlocking the Power of Reporting: Exploring the Link between Voluntary Sustainability Reporting, Customer Behavior, and Firm Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Bernhard E. Reichert & Matthias Sohn, 2022. "How Corporate Charitable Giving Reduces the Costs of Formal Controls," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 689-704, April.
    18. Boyle, Erik S. & Mintchik, Natalia & Warne, Rick C., 2023. "When it pays to be a friend: Investigating nonprofessional investors' judgments toward CSR companies following an accounting restatement," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Disclosure; Social Disclosure; Earnings;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2020-06-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.