IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2019-01-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feasibility Study of Renewable Energy Deployment Scenarios in Remote Arctic Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Yulia Alexandrovna Nazarova

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Budi Luhur, Jakarta, Indonesia.)

  • Natalya Yuryevna Sopilko

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Budi Luhur, Jakarta, Indonesia.)

  • Andrey Valentinovich Kulakov

    (Non - profit Partnership Renewable Energy Council 12, BLDG. 2, Office 104, Novaya Basmannaya Street, Moscow, Russia,)

  • Irina Ivanovna Shatalova

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Budi Luhur, Jakarta, Indonesia.)

  • Olga Yuryevna Myasnikova

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Budi Luhur, Jakarta, Indonesia.)

  • Nataliya Vital evna Bondarchuk

    (Russian State Social University, Vil gelma Picka Street, 4, Moscow, Russia.)

Abstract

The paper aims to analyze the economic efficiency of investments in renewable energy in remote areas of the Russian Arctic. Despite the proximity to oil and gas wells, the development of renewable energy sources (RES) is most promising in these locations. The paper presents a feasibility study of two investment options based on RES with a calculation of electricity costs which ensure an expected return to potential investors. The estimation is given in comparison to the existing electricity rates in some communities of the Russian Arctic. The investigation revealed that the investment in RES is feasible but requires a proper technical and financial estimation. The estimation of undiscounted future cash flows may not be sufficient in case of long-term investments; high initial capital investments in RES are not always covered by lower operating costs. As a conclusion, the investment option of the wind-power plant with the system of accumulation and use of energy in the form of hydrogen, bound in a liquid organic carrier is less financially attractive due to high capital investments in comparison with the variant of wind-diesel deployment. The given calculations can provide an economic feasibility approach in finding the best option for RES deployment in remote Arctic areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulia Alexandrovna Nazarova & Natalya Yuryevna Sopilko & Andrey Valentinovich Kulakov & Irina Ivanovna Shatalova & Olga Yuryevna Myasnikova & Nataliya Vital evna Bondarchuk, 2019. "Feasibility Study of Renewable Energy Deployment Scenarios in Remote Arctic Communities," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 330-335.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2019-01-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/7343/4127
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/7343/4127
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yulia Alexandrovna Nazarova & Natalya Yuryevna Sopilko & Rimma Shoidorzhievna Bolotova & Natalya Sergeevna Shcherbakova & Vladimir Borisovich Alexeenko, 2017. "Increase of Social Impact Due to the Development of the Renewable Energy Industry in Russia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(5), pages 263-270.
    2. Boute, Anatole, 2016. "Off-grid renewable energy in remote Arctic areas: An analysis of the Russian Far East," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1029-1037.
    3. Söderholm, Kristina & Söderholm, Patrik & Helenius, Heidi & Pettersson, Maria & Viklund, Roine & Masloboev, Vladimir & Mingaleva, Tatiana & Petrov, Viktor, 2015. "Environmental regulation and competitiveness in the mining industry: Permitting processes with special focus on Finland, Sweden and Russia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 130-142.
    4. Nong, Duy & Countryman, Amanda M. & Warziniack, Travis, 2018. "Potential impacts of expanded Arctic Alaska energy resource extraction on US energy sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 574-584.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalya Yuryevna Sopilko & Olga Yuryevna Myasnikova & Nataliya Vital evna Bondarchuk & Natalia Anatolyevna Navrotskaia & Tatyana Evgenyevna Migaleva, 2020. "Analysis and Prospects for the Development of Regional Energy Integration of the Eurasian Economic Union Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 13-20.
    2. Olga Y. Myasnikova & Svitlana M. Lysytska & Tatyana E. Migaleva & Nataliya V. Bondarchuk & Ekaterina A. Vetrova, 2019. "Ecological-and-economic Approach to the use of Recycled Biomaterials as an Energy Resource," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 234-241.
    3. Liya R. Artemkina & Natalya Y. Sopilko & Olga Y. Myasnikova & Irina U. Eremina & Nataliya V. Bondarchuk & Sergey V. Shamsheev, 2019. "The Model of Upstream Investment Portfolio in the Mature Regions," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 173-180.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evgeny Lisin & Wadim Strielkowski & Veronika Chernova & Alena Fomina, 2018. "Assessment of the Territorial Energy Security in the Context of Energy Systems Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Nong, Duy & Nguyen, Duong Binh & Nguyen, Trung H. & Wang, Can & Siriwardana, Mahinda, 2020. "A stronger energy strategy for a new era of economic development in Vietnam: A quantitative assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Song, Malin & Du, Juntao & Tan, Kim Hua, 2018. "Impact of fiscal decentralization on green total factor productivity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 359-367.
    4. Hui Zou & Xuejun Duan & Lei Wang & Tingting Jin, 2022. "The effects of environmental regulation on chemical industry location: Evidence from the region along the Yangtze River, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 800-822, June.
    5. Söderholm, Patrik, 2023. "How environmental permitting uncertainty in large-scale mining could influence subcontractors: The underlying chicken-and-egg problem," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Svetlana Balashova & Svetlana Ratner & Konstantin Gomonov & Andrey Berezin, 2020. "Modeling Consumer and Industry Reaction to Renewable Support Schemes: Empirical Evidence from the USA and Applications for Russia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 158-167.
    7. Odin Foldvik Eikeland & Filippo Maria Bianchi & Harry Apostoleris & Morten Hansen & Yu-Cheng Chiou & Matteo Chiesa, 2021. "Predicting Energy Demand in Semi-Remote Arctic Locations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2020. "The impacts of EIA procedure on the mining sector in the permit process of mining operating activities & Turkey analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Prince Amoah & Gabriel Eweje, 2021. "Impact mitigation or ecological restoration? Examining the environmental sustainability practices of multinational mining companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 551-565, January.
    10. Zhang, Yaxin & Zeng, Shibo & Wu, Qiaosheng & Fu, Junyi & Li, Tongping, 2023. "A study on the impact of the carbon emissions trading policy on the mining industry based on Porter hypothesis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    11. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2022. "Considering the recent increase in license fees in Turkey, how can the negative effect of the fees on the mining operating costs be reduced?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    12. Jin, Haifeng, 2023. "Analyzing factors and resource policymaking options for sustainable resource management and carbon neutrality in mining industry: Empirical study in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    13. Boulamanti, Aikaterini & Moya, Jose A., 2017. "Production costs of the chemical industry in the EU and other countries: Ammonia, methanol and light olefins," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 1205-1212.
    14. Die Hu & Yuandi Wang & Yu Li, 2017. "How Does Open Innovation Modify the Relationship between Environmental Regulations and Productivity?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1132-1143, December.
    15. Alexander N. Alekseev & Aleksei V. Bogoviz & Ludmila P. Goncharenko & Sergey A. Sybachin, 2019. "A Critical Review of Russia s Energy Strategy in the Period until 2035," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 95-102.
    16. Kozlova, Mariia, 2017. "Real option valuation in renewable energy literature: Research focus, trends and design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 180-196.
    17. Aldieri, Luigi & Kotsemir, Maxim & Paolo Vinci, Concetto, 2021. "Environmental innovations and productivity: Empirical evidence from Russian regions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Hlalefang Khobai & Nwabisa Kolisi & Clement Moyo & Izunna Anyikwa & Siyasanga Dingela, 2020. "Renewable Energy Consumption and Unemployment in South Africa," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 170-178.
    19. Boulamanti, Aikaterini & Moya, Jose Antonio, 2016. "Production costs of the non-ferrous metals in the EU and other countries: Copper and zinc," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 112-118.
    20. Nong, Duy, 2020. "Development of the electricity-environmental policy CGE model (GTAP-E-PowerS): A case of the carbon tax in South Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Renewable energy; wind turbine; hydrogen energy carriers; diesel generation; the Russian Arctic.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q4 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2019-01-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.