IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2017-02-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Implementing Activity-based Costing Technique and Its Impact on Profitability: A Study of Listed Manufacturing Companies in Jordan

Author

Listed:
  • Laith Akram Muflih Al-Qudah

    (Al-Balqa Applied University Amman University College for Financial & Administrative Sciences, Amman, Jordan)

  • Yusuf Ali Khalaf Al-Hroot

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Administrative & Financial Sciences, Philadelphia University, Jordan.)

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to investigate and evaluate the effect of implementing the activity-based costing technique (ABC) to the profitability of the manufacturing companies in Jordan. The sample of this study includes 72 observations; these observations are six financial ratios based on the financial statements of 12 industrial companies in Jordan that implemented the ABC technique in the period 2000-2011. A 4-year average pre and post the implementation of the ABC technique is taken for all technique variables. The profitability ratios are the return on assets (ROA), return on investment ratio (ROI), return on equity (ROE), gross profit margin (GP), operating margin ratio (OM), and net profit margin ratios (ROS). Using a paired t-test in order to test the significance difference between the pre and post implementation of the ABC technique, the results indicate that four financial ratios, namely the OM, ROS, ROA, and ROE ratios increased and improved after the implementation of the ABC technique. The OM and ROA ratios recorded as the highest ratios for 58.33% of the companies in the sample, while the ROS and ROE ratios increased by 50% for the companies in the sample. Furthermore, the GP ratio indicates that most ratios decreased after the implementation of the ABC technique. The ratio deteriorated for 9 companies out of 12 in the GP ratio, which means that 75% of the companies experienced a decrease in the GP ratio after the implementation of the ABC technique. In addition the ROI ratio decreased for 7 companies out of 12. The results also show little evidence suggesting that using the ABC technique improves the company's profitability ratios with a percentage of 47.22% and there is a general decrease in the profitability ratios for companies that implement the ABC technique with a percentage of 52.78%. It can be concluded that there is no significant overall improvement in the profitability ratios of Jordanian manufacturing companies after the implementation of the ABC technique.

Suggested Citation

  • Laith Akram Muflih Al-Qudah & Yusuf Ali Khalaf Al-Hroot, 2017. "The Implementing Activity-based Costing Technique and Its Impact on Profitability: A Study of Listed Manufacturing Companies in Jordan," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 271-276.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2017-02-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/4384/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/4384/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahmoud Nassar & Husam Aldeen Al‐Khadash & Alan Sangster & Osama Mah’d, 2013. "Factors that catalyse, facilitate and motivate the decision to implement activity‐based costing in Jordanian industrial companies," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(1), pages 18-36, May.
    2. Husam Aldeen Al-Khadash & Mahmoud Nassar, 2010. "The implementation of activity-based costing and the financial performance of the Jordanian industrial shareholding companies," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 135-153.
    3. Christopher D. Ittner & William N. Lanen & David F. Larcker, 2002. "The Association Between Activity‐Based Costing and Manufacturing Performance," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 711-726, June.
    4. Banker, Rajiv D. & Bardhan, Indranil R. & Chen, Tai-Yuan, 2008. "The role of manufacturing practices in mediating the impact of activity-based costing on plant performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karim Charaf & Ahmed Fath-Allah Rahmouni & Mohamed Sabar, 2022. "The Association Between Activity-Based Costing And Performance: Empirical Evidence From Moroccan Companies," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 21(1), pages 25-50, March.
    2. Maiga, Adam S., 2014. "Assessing self-selection and endogeneity issues in the relation between activity-based costing and performance," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 251-262.
    3. Hadid, Wael & Hamdan, Mohammed, 2022. "Firm size and cost system sophistication: The role of firm age," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(2).
    4. Holm, Morten & Kumar, V. & Plenborg, Thomas, 2016. "An investigation of Customer Accounting systems as a source of sustainable competitive advantage," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 18-30.
    5. Maiga, Adam S. & Nilsson, Anders & Jacobs, Fred A., 2014. "Assessing the interaction effect of cost control systems and information technology integration on manufacturing plant financial performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 77-90.
    6. Eldenburg, Leslie & Soderstrom, Naomi & Willis, Veronda & Wu, Anne, 2010. "Behavioral changes following the collaborative development of an accounting information system," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 222-237, February.
    7. Jana Fibírová, 2008. "The Competitive Advantage of Management Accounting [Konkurenční výhoda manažerského účetnictví]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(2), pages 78-90.
    8. Atef Aqeel Al-Bawab & Hani Al-Rawashdeh, 2016. "The Impact of the Activity Based Costing System (A.B.C.) in the Pricing of Services Banks in the Jordanian commercial Banks: A Field Study," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, April.
    9. Malcolm J. Beynon & Margaret Heffernan & Aoife M. McDermott, 2012. "Psychological Contracts And Job Satisfaction: Clustering Analysis Using Evidential C‐Means And Comparison With Other Techniques," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(4), pages 247-273, October.
    10. Adeeb Abdulwahab Al-Hebry & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari, 2017. "A Critical Study of Cost Approaches in the Accounting Thought: Conceptual Study," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 105-112.
    11. Schoute, Martijn, 2011. "The relationship between product diversity, usage of advanced manufacturing technologies and activity-based costing adoption," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 120-134.
    12. Jana Pokorná, 2016. "Impact of Activity-Based Costing on Financial Performance in the Czech Republic," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(2), pages 643-652.
    13. Uyar, Ali & Kuzey, Cemil, 2016. "Does management accounting mediate the relationship between cost system design and performance?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 170-176.
    14. Su, Sophia & Baird, Kevin & Phan, Thanh, 2024. "The association between ethical leadership and environmental activity management: The mediating role of employee environmental empowerment," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    15. Banker, Rajiv D. & Bardhan, Indranil R. & Chen, Tai-Yuan, 2008. "The role of manufacturing practices in mediating the impact of activity-based costing on plant performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Alexander Himme, 2012. "Critical success factors of strategic cost reduction," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 183-210, December.
    17. Alcouffe, Simon & Galy, Nadine & Gaté, Loïc, 2016. "Une méta-analyse qualitative de la littérature sur les déterminants de l'adoption de l'activity-based costing [A meta-analysis of the literature on the determinants of the adoption of activity-base," MPRA Paper 73381, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Kamilah Ahmad, 2017. "The Implementation of Management Accounting Practices and its Relationship with Performance in Small and Medium Enterprises," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 342-353.
    19. Maria-Victòria Sánchez-Rebull & Angels Niñerola & Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara, 2023. "After 30 Years, What Has Happened to Activity-Based Costing? A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    20. Cristiano Busco & Ariela Caglio & Robert Scapens, 2015. "Management and accounting innovations: reflecting on what they are and why they are adopted," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(3), pages 495-524, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Activity-based Costing Technique; Profitability; Jordan;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L6 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2017-02-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.