IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2015-04-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Policy in the Context of Budget Mechanism Reformation: Goals Outline and the Tools Required for Successful Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Liudmila Ivanovna Votintseva

    (Department of Finances and Credit, School of Economics and Management, Far Eastern Federal University, 8 Suhanova St., Vladivostok, Russia,)

  • Dzhamilya Alimovna Sozaeva

    (Department of Enterprise Economy and Finance, Moscow University for Industry and Finance Synergy, 80 Leningrad Ave., Moscow, Russia)

  • Marina Yurievna Andreeva

    (Department of Enterprise Economy and Finance, Moscow University for Industry and Finance Synergy, 80 Leningrad Ave., Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The article covers the methodological aspects of the system program tool for innovative policy that would facilitate the implementation of national top-priority projects under the conditions of budget mechanism reformation. The practice of innovative development regional programming uses patterns, which have proven to have low efficiency and produce fragmentation rather than achieving the expected results due to the types of design implemented. Relying on the synthesis of theoretical background, empirical assessments and practical experience in applying management by objective for the region budget formation and use, the authors show how a tooling of the system program mechanism can be used to create a basis for reformatting the existing innovative development model into a desired condition, which is well balanced in respect of goals, needs and the possibilities of achieving consensus among the region entities

Suggested Citation

  • Liudmila Ivanovna Votintseva & Dzhamilya Alimovna Sozaeva & Marina Yurievna Andreeva, 2015. "Innovation Policy in the Context of Budget Mechanism Reformation: Goals Outline and the Tools Required for Successful Implementation," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 5(4), pages 1024-1028.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2015-04-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/1476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/1476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tamilina, Larysa & Baklanova, Olena, 2012. "Способы формирования контрактных институтов как факторы экономического ростa: сравнительный анализ [Means of economic institutional formation as determinants of economic growth: a comparative analy," MPRA Paper 50171, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew McCormick & Mark E. Paddrik & Carlos Ramírez, 2021. "The Dynamics of the U.S. Overnight Triparty Repo Market," FEDS Notes 2021-08-02, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    2. Ana Fostel & John Geanakoplos & Gregory Phelan, 2019. "Global Collateral and Capital Flows," Department of Economics Working Papers 2019-01, Department of Economics, Williams College.
    3. Olena Baklanova & Mariana Petrova & Viktor Koval, 2020. "Institutional Transmission in Economic Development," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 68-91.
    4. Steffen Murau, 2017. "Shadow money and the public money supply: the impact of the 2007–2009 financial crisis on the monetary system," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 802-838, September.
    5. Andrea Roncella & Ignacio Ferrero, 2020. "A MacIntyrean Perspective on the Collapse of a Money Market Fund," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 29-43, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Regional Complex Models; Innovation Policy; Fragmentarity; Budget Process Reforming;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • H52 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Education
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2015-04-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.