IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecj/econjl/v113y2003i489p576-597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A theoretical analysis of institutional investors' trading costs in auction and dealer markets

Author

Listed:
  • Andy Snell
  • Ian Tonks

Abstract

This paper compares trading costs for institutional investors subject to liquidity shocks, in auction and dealer markets. The batch auction restricts the institutions' ability to exploit informational advantages because of competition between institutions when they simultaneously submit orders. This competition lowers aggregate trading costs. In the dealership market, competition between traders is absent but private information is revealed by observing the flow of successive orders and so reduces aggregate trading costs. We analyse the relative effects on trading costs of competition and information revelation in the two systems and derive a parameter inequality which determines which system has lower costs. Copyright 2003 Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Andy Snell & Ian Tonks, 2003. "A theoretical analysis of institutional investors' trading costs in auction and dealer markets," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(489), pages 576-597, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:113:y:2003:i:489:p:576-597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Angelidis, Timotheos & Andrikopoulos, Andreas, 2010. "Idiosyncratic risk, returns and liquidity in the London Stock Exchange: A spillover approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 214-221, June.
    2. Alzahrani, Ahmed A. & Gregoriou, Andros & Hudson, Robert, 2012. "Can market frictions really explain the price impact asymmetry of block trades? Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 202-209.
    3. repec:grz:wpsses:2012-01 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Hung‐Neng Lai, 2007. "The Market Quality of Dealer versus Hybrid Markets: The Case of Moderately Liquid Securities," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1‐2), pages 349-373, January.
    5. Isa E. Hafalir & Serkan Imisiker, 2022. "Call Auctions with Contingent Orders," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-8, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:113:y:2003:i:489:p:576-597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.