IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecj/econjl/v102y1992i414p1102-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Wage Increases Pay for Themselves? Tests with a Production Function

Author

Listed:
  • Levine, David I

Abstract

Efficiency wage theories predict that companies that pay high wages will have higher productivity from high work effort, low turnover, and other efficiency-enhancing effects. This paper uses the PIMS line-of-business data set to test whether high wage businesses are more productive. Relative wages were measured by managers' assessments of their relative compensation, holding worker quality constant. A positive relation was found between changes in relative wages and changes in total factor productivity. The elasticity of output with respect to wages was of the magnitude predicted by efficiency wage theories. Also consistent with efficiency wage theories, the relationship between changes in wages and changes in productivity was weaker at businesses with high unionization. Results from two additional data sets imply that high wages are not merely measuring high human capital. Copyright 1992 by Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Levine, David I, 1992. "Can Wage Increases Pay for Themselves? Tests with a Production Function," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 102(414), pages 1102-1115, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:102:y:1992:i:414:p:1102-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%28199209%29102%3A414%3C1102%3ACWIPFT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-X&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:102:y:1992:i:414:p:1102-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.