IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecj/econjl/v101y1991i406p508-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Discrimination in the British Labour Market: A Reassessment

Author

Listed:
  • Wright, Robert E
  • Ermisch, John F

Abstract

For the first time, data on women's employment histories is used to study the gap between women's and men's pay in Great Britain. The analysis shows that women's hourly pay would be about 20 percent higher in the absence of "discrimination," and that measures of women's work experience that are imputed by backward-projection from a cross-section employment participation equation are highly correlated with actual experience and produce similar estimates of women's earnings functions and discrimination. Copyright 1991 by Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Wright, Robert E & Ermisch, John F, 1991. "Gender Discrimination in the British Labour Market: A Reassessment," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 101(406), pages 508-522, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:101:y:1991:i:406:p:508-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%28199105%29101%3A406%3C508%3AGDITBL%3E2.0.CO%3B2-2&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:101:y:1991:i:406:p:508-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.