IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-17-00249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade Induced Firm Productivity and Division of Labor in a General Equilibrium with Oligopoly

Author

Listed:
  • Keita Kamei

    (Yamagata University)

Abstract

We construct a general equilibrium model with oligopoly that embeds Smith's (1776) famous theory of the division of labor under vertical specialization. Firms have to perform their sequential tasks in their product chain to produce the final good. To perform their tasks, firms optimally organize the teams and assign them tasks but they incur costs in performing this organizational work. If the number of teams increases, then firm productivity also improves. We show that, if the number of firms is exogenous, trade liberalization does not affect firm productivity. Meanwhile, if the number of firms is endogenous, trade liberalization improves firm productivity. This occurs because pro-competitive trade liberalization decreases the number of domestic firms. The surviving firms can then employ more labor and increase their productivity because, using new employment, they organize the new teams to promote a deeper division of labor in relation to their product lines.

Suggested Citation

  • Keita Kamei, 2017. "Trade Induced Firm Productivity and Division of Labor in a General Equilibrium with Oligopoly," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(4), pages 2384-2393.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-17-00249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2017/Volume37/EB-17-V37-I4-P213.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Trade; Division of Labor; Firm Productivity; Cournot Competition; General Oligopolistic Equilibrium (GOLE);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • D2 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-17-00249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.