IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-14-00813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Kuznets Curve and ecological footprint: A time series analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Marie-Sophie Hervieux

    (LEMNA, University of Nantes)

  • Olivier Darné

    (LEMNA, University of Nantes)

Abstract

In this paper we examine the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis using the Ecological Footprint (EF), a more comprehensive indicator of environmental degradation, through a time-series analysis for seven Latin American countries covering the 1961-2007 period. We first test the EKC hypothesis from traditional linear and quadratic functions, with standard and logarithmic specifications. The EKC hypothesis is not supported for Latin American countries, suggesting that there is no improvement of environmental degradation when income increases. We find that most of the countries exhibit a positive linear relationship between the EF and GDP. Finally, we study the long-term relationship between the EF and GDP. The results show evidence of long-term relationship between income and EF for Brazil and Uruguay with quadratic and linear relationship, respectively, which improves the quality of the regressions.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie-Sophie Hervieux & Olivier Darné, 2015. "Environmental Kuznets Curve and ecological footprint: A time series analysis," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(1), pages 814-826.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-14-00813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2015/Volume35/EB-15-V35-I1-P84.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shokoohi, Zeinab & Dehbidi, Navid Kargar & Tarazkar, Mohammad Hassan, 2022. "Energy intensity, economic growth and environmental quality in populous Middle East countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    2. Selim J rgen Ergun & Maria Fernanda Rivas, 2020. "Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Uruguay using Ecological Footprint as a Measure of Environmental Degradation," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 473-485.
    3. Koç, Pınar & Gülmez, Ahmet, 2021. "Analysis of relationships between nanotechnology applications, mineral saving and ecological footprint: Evidence from panel fourier cointegration and causality tests," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Muhammed Ashiq Villanthenkodath & Mohd Arshad Ansari & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente & Elma Satrovic, 2024. "The Comprehensive Impact of Economic Growth on Environmental Quality: Insight Established on Material, Carbon, and Ecological Footprint," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 1-34, September.
    5. Iftikhar Yasin & Nawaz Ahmad & M. Aslam Chaudhary, 2020. "Catechizing the Environmental-Impression of Urbanization, Financial Development, and Political Institutions: A Circumstance of Ecological Footprints in 110 Developed and Less-Developed Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 621-649, January.
    6. Cüneyt Kılıç & Semanur Soyyiğit & Seda Bayrakdar, 2024. "Economic Complexity, Ecological Footprint, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Findings from Selected Industrialized Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 7402-7427, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Kuznets Curve; Ecological Footprint;

    JEL classification:

    • Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-14-00813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.