IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/lifesc/v1y2015i1p25-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Development Of Tokio And Planned Multiple Centers

Author

Listed:
  • Aziz KARADAÞ, Hüseyin CENGÝZ

    (Beþiktaþ Belediyesi - AMEA Mimarlýk ve Ýncesanat Enstitüsü Doktora Öðrencisi, Yýldýz Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlýk Fakültesi Þehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölüm Baþkaný)

Abstract

The most dominant subject in 20th century urban planning is how to resolve the growth issue of huge metropolitan regions which was on the agenda even by the end of 19th century. When many observers became aware that the issues arose with the unexpected growth of huge cities were different from the previous urban problems in terms of quality and that new planning forces were required, they discussed about the size of these cities and their structure. The main problems of overgrowing cities include jam in transportation systems (especially in highways), increase in land prices, spending more time to reach workplace and low work performance due to the long journey, reduced access to open areas and rural areas, increased infrastructure work costs, increased air and water pollution, increased health problems, demoralization and increased crime rate. The most well accepted solution for these issues was to promote intensified activities at metropolitan regions named generally as sub-center or satellite city. Sub-centers are the regions which are employment and trade centers apart from the business center, and constantly developed; and where train, metro and bus transits intersect. Satellite cities are newly developed regions or regions which are developed in addition to the existing areas which are separated from metropolitan centers with green areas. In this article, the effect of sub-centers and satellite centers in Tokyo Metropolitan Region is analyzed. First, the development of Metropolitan Planning ideas starting with Ebenezer Howard in 1898 and reach until 1990 was summarized, and then it was concluded that Tokyo region showed a development with multiple centers by analyzing the population and employment data between 1970 and 1995 to determine to what extent the growth structure with multiple centers show itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Aziz KARADAÞ, Hüseyin CENGÝZ, 2015. "Urban Development Of Tokio And Planned Multiple Centers," Eurasian Life Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 25-52, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eas:lifesc:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:25-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://lifesciences.eurasianacademy.org/dergi/../dergi//tokyonun-sehirsel-gelisimi-ve-planli-cok-merkezlilik201505.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R Cervero & K-L Wu, 1997. "Polycentrism, Commuting, and Residential Location in the San Francisco Bay Area," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(5), pages 865-886, May.
    2. Peter Hall, 1997. "The Future of the Metropolis and its Form," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 211-220.
    3. P Gordon & H W Richardson & H L Wong, 1986. "The Distribution of Population and Employment in a Polycentric City: The Case of Los Angeles," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 18(2), pages 161-173, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McMillen, Daniel P. & Smith, Stefani C., 2003. "The number of subcenters in large urban areas," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 321-338, May.
    2. McMillen, Daniel P., 2001. "Nonparametric Employment Subcenter Identification," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 448-473, November.
    3. Carlos Marmolejo Duarte & Carlos Aguirre Nuñez & Eduardo Chica Mejia & Claudia Perez Prieto & Jaume Masip Tresserra, 2011. "Polycentrism in the Spanish metropolitan system: an analysis for 7 metro areas," ERSA conference papers ersa11p119, European Regional Science Association.
    4. GUILLAIN, Rachel & LE GALLO, Julie & BOITEUX-ORAIN, Céline, 2004. "The evolution of the spatial and sectoral patterns in Ile-De-France over 1978-1997," LEG - Document de travail - Economie 2004-02, LEG, Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion, CNRS, Université de Bourgogne.
    5. Emilie ARNOULT & Florent SARI, 2016. "Analyse Spatiale De L’Espace Urbain : Le Cas De L’Agglomération Lyonnaise," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 43, pages 77-110.
    6. Anas, Alex & Arnott, Richard & Small, Kenneth A., 1997. "Urban Spatial Structure," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt835049q3, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Alex Anas & Richard Arnott & Kenneth A. Small, 1998. "Urban Spatial Structure," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1426-1464, September.
    8. Blanca Arellano & Montserrat Moix & Josep Roca, 2011. "Towards a New Methodology to evaluate the Urban structure of the Metropolitan Systems; Chicago and Barcelona Metropolitan Areas as Examples," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1779, European Regional Science Association.
    9. McMillen, Daniel P. & William Lester, T., 2003. "Evolving subcenters: employment and population densities in Chicago, 1970-2020," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 60-81, March.
    10. Alpkokin, Pelin & Cheung, Charles & Black, John & Hayashi, Yoshitsugu, 2008. "Dynamics of clustered employment growth and its impacts on commuting patterns in rapidly developing cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 427-444, March.
    11. Anne Aguilera & Jean-Loup Madre & Dominique Mignot, 2004. "Métropolisation, formes urbaines et mobilité. Présentation du dossier," Post-Print halshs-00068411, HAL.
    12. Panagiotis NIKOLOPOULOS & Andreas GKOUZOS & Athanasios PAPADASKALOPOULOS, 2018. "Morphological Polycentricity In Southern Europe: Evidence At The National Level," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(4), pages 73-93, November.
    13. Jae Ik Kim & Chang Hwan Yeo & Jin-Hwi Kwon, 2014. "Spatial change in urban employment distribution in Seoul metropolitan city: clustering, dispersion and general dispersion," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 355-372, November.
    14. Ivan Muñiz & Anna Galindo & Miguel Angel García, 2005. "Descentralisation, Integration and polycentrism in Barcelona," Working Papers wpdea0512, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    15. Juan Zhu & Xinyi Niu & Cheng Shi, 2019. "The Influencing Factors of a Polycentric Employment System on Jobs-Housing Matching—A Case Study of Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    16. Clark, William A. V. & Huang, Youqin & Withers, Suzanne, 2003. "Does commuting distance matter?: Commuting tolerance and residential change," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 199-221, March.
    17. Daniela Smiraglia & Luca Salvati & Gianluca Egidi & Rosanna Salvia & Antonio Giménez-Morera & Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, 2021. "Toward a New Urban Cycle? A Closer Look to Sprawl, Demographic Transitions and the Environment in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Chunil Kim & Choongik Choi, 2019. "Towards Sustainable Urban Spatial Structure: Does Decentralization Reduce Commuting Times?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, February.
    19. Mejia-Dorantes, Lucia & Lucas, Karen, 2014. "Public transport investment and local regeneration: A comparison of London׳s Jubilee Line Extension and the Madrid Metrosur," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 241-252.
    20. Nicolas, Jean-Pierre & Pelé, Nicolas, 2018. "Reprint of Measuring trends in household expenditures for daily mobility. The case in Lyon, France, between 1995 and 2015," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 19-29.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:lifesc:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:25-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://lifesciences.eurasianacademy.org/eng/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.