IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/journl/vy2016ip75-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Training Need Analysis in the Organizations: An Assessment in Terms of Data Collection Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Taylan Zeyrek

    (Avrasya Akademi)

  • Ä°dil Işık

Abstract

Training and development functions gain a more important position in the organisations day by day. Training need analysis plays a key role in structuring and applying the training processes. When the approaches of need analysis are examined, it is observed that common titles like subject and reason of the need, target groups, and reporting exist in many approaches. The data collection methods which are used for need analysis show differences according to the approach adopted. In this study, the aim is to examine the training need analysis in terms of two different methods. For this purpose, training need analysis was performed with two different approaches, and the results have been compared in terms of the perception of the participants. The study was performed with the employees from different layers of the organization with the qualitative methods such as interviews, focus group study, and the quantitative method like questionnaire, and tests. The questionnaire, interview and focus group study that are defined as the classical methods were used in the first study; and a psychometric test that is defined as modern method was used in the second study; and then the results from both analysis were compared. No prominent difference was found between these methods according to perceptions of the participants in the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Taylan Zeyrek & Ä°dil Işık, 2016. "Training Need Analysis in the Organizations: An Assessment in Terms of Data Collection Methods," Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 0, pages 75-84, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v::y:2016:i::p:75-84
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.soc.2016.MSEMP-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/58
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.soc.2016.MSEMP-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v::y:2016:i::p:75-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.