IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/journl/vy2016ip609-621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Research About Comparing Burnout Levels of Different Working Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Burcu Özge ÖZASLAN ÇALIÅžKAN

    (Avrasya Akademi)

Abstract

The concept of burnout that retains its importance at present as a subject studied in different cultures and different working groups can be defined as the feeling of physical and emotional exhaustion of workers, resulting of not being able to overcome the difficulty and stress of the job. In this study, the burnout level of the workers for being flight service employee or ground service employee is investigated. It is tried to determine that the burnout level of these two group are differentiated to each other. Furthermore, it is tried to indicated that if the the burnout level of the workers are differentiated according to various variables like age, gender, work experience, salary etc. The data collected by using Maslach Burnout Inventory are evaluated. The results related burnout, that is consisted of three sub-dimensions which are emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, low personal accomplishment, reached using the SPSS packed programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Burcu Özge ÖZASLAN ÇALIÅžKAN, 2016. "A Research About Comparing Burnout Levels of Different Working Groups," Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 0, pages 609-621, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v::y:2016:i::p:609-621
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.soc.2016.MSEMP-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/62
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.soc.2016.MSEMP-49?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v::y:2016:i::p:609-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.