Author
Listed:
- Melisa Erdilek Karabay
(Avrasya Akademi)
- Meral Elçi
Abstract
This research intends to examine the effects of the ethical leadership on burnout behavior along with the perception differences of the private and public sector employees. For this purpose, a survey has been applied to 2366 employees in total, which consist of different sectors such as finance, automotive, service, food, tourism and public services in the cities of ?stanbul and Kocaeli. According to the results, two dimensions of the ethical leadership have significant meaningful effect on emotional exhaustion. Whilst injustice as a dimension of the ethical leadership has a positive effect on emotional exhaustion, ethical guidance is in the contrary direction. There is no influence of the role clarification dimension on Emotional Exhaustion. The negative effect of all sub dimensions of the ethical leadership has been found on depersonalization sub-dimension. While the ethical leadership and role clarification are affecting the depersonalization in negative way, injustice is affecting the depersonalization in positive direction. Based on the T-Tests results, which was applied to understand the perception differences, public sector employees perceive their leaders as more injustice and they feel more burnout than the employess in private sector. In reverse, public sector employees perceive their leaders much more ethical guide and they think that their leaders pay much attention on defining their subordinates roles and responsibilities. There is no significant result between two sectors on depersonalization.The literature presents lack of evidence on effects of ethical ladership on burnout behavior. In this respect, this study intends to be a pioneer in providing contribution to the academic literature.
Suggested Citation
Melisa Erdilek Karabay & Meral Elçi, 2016.
"Effect of Ethical Leadership on Burnout: Differences of Perceptions Among Public and Private Sector Employees,"
Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 0, pages 563-578, March.
Handle:
RePEc:eas:journl:v::y:2016:i::p:563-578
DOI: 10.17740/eas.soc.2016.MSEMP-45
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v::y:2016:i::p:563-578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.