IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/journl/vy2016ip536-542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study Related to Investigation of the Effects of Big Five Factor Model on Counterproductive Work Behaviors with Mediating Role of Organizational Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Ãœmit Behrem

    (Avrasya Akademi)

  • Serdar Bozkur

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine causes of counterproductive work behaviors that encountered in labor life frequently. Within this framework big five factor model and organizational justice perception were taken as main causes. A State University?s School of Business academicians constituted this study?s population. Data was taken 40 academicians who were chosen in this population. End of the study, a negative and middle correlation was found between openness to experience as a dimension of big five factor model with counterproductive work behaviors. There was no significant correlation determined between other dimensions of the big five factor model with counterproductive work behaviors. Also mediating role of organizational justice in effects of big five factor model on counterproductive work behaviors was investigated and there was no significant effect determined.

Suggested Citation

  • Ãœmit Behrem & Serdar Bozkur, 2016. "A Study Related to Investigation of the Effects of Big Five Factor Model on Counterproductive Work Behaviors with Mediating Role of Organizational Justice," Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 0, pages 536-542, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v::y:2016:i::p:536-542
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.soc.2016.MSEMP-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/70
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.soc.2016.MSEMP-43?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v::y:2016:i::p:536-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.