IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/journl/vy2016ip487-500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Relationship Between Burnout Syndrome and Presenteeism (Existing-Nonexisting at Work): The Example of SSI (Social Security Institution (SGK)) in Kars

Author

Listed:
  • Yunus ZENGÄ°N

    (Avrasya Akademi)

  • ErdoÄŸan KAYGIN

Abstract

While by development of communication, relations at working life become intense and complicated, problems that cause negations amd problems to be solved both for individuals and businesses appear. The problems among them arr burnout syndrome which is defined as individual?s feeling himself/herself weak in an emotional way, not caring manager, colleague, customers and believing her/his being unsuccessful, and presenteeism which especially expresses individual?s going to work even when they have health problems and their being unproductive. As the human factor is the most important factor for businesses and institutions, it is seen that these are the topics to be analyzed and it is chosen as a research subject because it is thought that both factors can affect each other. The aim of this study is to determine the relation between burnout syndrome and presenteeism (existing/nonexisting at work). By considering this, the other aim of this study is to find whether there are differences in aspects of demographical variances. A questionaire is applied to workers at Kars Social Security Institution data in paralel with the aim of study. A meaningful relation is seen between desensitisation which is a sub-dimension of burnout syndrome and presenteeism after analysis done. Besides, differences about aspects of demographical variances are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunus ZENGÄ°N & ErdoÄŸan KAYGIN, 2016. "Examining the Relationship Between Burnout Syndrome and Presenteeism (Existing-Nonexisting at Work): The Example of SSI (Social Security Institution (SGK)) in Kars," Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 0, pages 487-500, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v::y:2016:i::p:487-500
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.soc.2016.MSEMP-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/67
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.soc.2016.MSEMP-39?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v::y:2016:i::p:487-500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.