IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/journl/v55y2024i55p17-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking Of Selected Nasdaq100 Companies According To Their Financial Performance With Mcrat And Raps

Author

Listed:
  • Kubilay ERÄ°ÅžLÄ°K

Abstract

In this study, two new multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDMs) for investment decision making in the stock market are introduced. The first method is called multiple criteria ranking by alternative trail (MCRAT); the second method is ranking alternatives by perimeter similarity (RAPS). In this study, 79 stocks in the NASDAQ 100 index are ranked by MCRAT and RAPS methods based on 9 different financial indicators. The ranking results obtained were compared with the widely preferred TOPSIS method using the same alternatives and criteria. As a result of the analysis, it is observed that MCRAT and RAPS methods have high correlation with the ranking results obtained by TOPSIS method. Therefore, it is concluded that MCRAT and RAPS methods can be used with confidence when making investment decisions in the stock market.

Suggested Citation

  • Kubilay ERÄ°ÅžLÄ°K, 2024. "Ranking Of Selected Nasdaq100 Companies According To Their Financial Performance With Mcrat And Raps," Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 55(55), pages 17-31, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:55:y:2024:i:55:p:17-31
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.soc.2024.V55.02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/1485
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.soc.2024.V55.02?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:55:y:2024:i:55:p:17-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.