IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/journl/v38y2021i38p1-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship Between Nurses' Psychological Capital And Perceptions Of Organizational Democracy

Author

Listed:
  • Åžehrinaz POLAT

    (Ä°stanbul Ãœniversitesi)

  • Hanife TÄ°RYAKÄ° ÅžEN

    (İstanbul İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü)

  • Handan ALAN

    (Ä°stanbul Ãœniversitesi CerrahpaÅŸa)

Abstract

To determine the relationship between nurses' psychological capital and organizational democracy perceptions. The research was conducted in a descriptive and cross-sectional design. Data were collected from a total of 590 nurses working in a university hospital. Personal information form, Organizational Democracy Scale, and Psychological Capital Questionnaire were used in data collection. Number-percentage calculation, Independent Samples t-Test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson’s correlation analysis, simple linear regression analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis methods were used in the evaluation of the data. It was found that the general total of psychological capital was at a moderate level, and the mean score of the organizational democracy scale was below the moderate level. It has been determined that there is a significant relationship between nurses' psychological capital and organizational democracy levels. Manager nurses can determine strategies to improve the psychological capital of employees to strengthen their perception of organizational democracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Åžehrinaz POLAT & Hanife TÄ°RYAKÄ° ÅžEN & Handan ALAN, 2021. "The Relationship Between Nurses' Psychological Capital And Perceptions Of Organizational Democracy," Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 38(38), pages 1-11, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:38:y:2021:i:38:p:1-11
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.soc.2021.V38-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/359
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.soc.2021.V38-01?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:38:y:2021:i:38:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.