Author
Abstract
To those who seek help for their health; A work environment without burnout is of great importance in order to provide careful service, to work with zero error, to achieve the goals of quality service, high efficiency and patient satisfaction. The purpose of the modern system approach; It means a health worker who is satisfied, happy, who loves his job and is satisfied, highly motivated, not tired of his job, ie not exhausted. In this context, it is necessary to emphasize the importance of burnout in the field of health and for healthcare workers and to draw attention to its sensitivity. The risk of burnout is higher than many occupational groups, as a result of the one-to-one work of healthcare professionals with high-expectancy patients and their relatives. The aim of this study is to emphasize the effects of burnout in healthcare professionals on healthcare personnel. The burnout status of 378 physicians, nurses, senior managers, midlevel managers and healthcare professionals working in Public Hospital was evaluated in terms of demographic and general characteristics. The general burnout score of 2.33 shows that the participants have moderate burnout in terms of "sometimes". For the sampling; burnout sub-dimension was higher than depersonalization and competence subdimensions. Burnout does not differ significantly in terms of gender and marital status. A significant difference was found in terms of age, child status, number of children, education level, service time, duty status, and the department they work in. In addition, the depletion sub-dimension positively affected the depersonalization sub-dimension by 71.8% and the depersonalization sub-dimension positively by 16.0%. The burnout sub-dimension did not affect the competence sub-dimension statistically significantly.
Suggested Citation
Tuğba ÇELİK & Abdulkadir GÜÇLÜ, 2021.
"Burnout In Health Institutions: Research In A Public Hospital,"
Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 35(35), pages 22-41, March.
Handle:
RePEc:eas:journl:v:35:y:2021:i:35:p:22-41
DOI: 10.17740/eas.soc.2021.V35-02
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:35:y:2021:i:35:p:22-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.