IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/journl/v25y2019i25p35-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Examination Of The Relationship Between Organizational Justice And Psychological Empowerment

Author

Listed:
  • Gülay TAMER

    (Ä°stanbul GeliÅŸim Ãœniversitesi)

Abstract

The perceptions of empowerment and justice that employees create in their minds affect all processes within the organization. Psychological empowerment is the perception of the organization that the organization has built to empower its employees. Organizational justice encompasses rules and social norms developed in the distribution of benefits, distribution processes and interpersonal relationships. This study aims to determine the relationship between psychological empowerment and perceptions of organizational justice. The 105 employees who work in a public institution constitute the universe of the researcher. According to Spearman correlation analysis results, the statistically significant relation was found between psychological empowerment and organizational justice perception. The main hypothesis has not been rejected. The study also examined the relationship between dimensions of psychological empowerment and dimensions of organizational justice. The results revealed a statistically significant relationship. The most striking result is that the relationship between the dimension of autonomy and the dimension of organizational justice is found to be strongest. The weakest relationship is the relationship between the meaning dimension of psychological empowerment and the dimensions of the concept of organizational justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Gülay TAMER, 2019. "An Examination Of The Relationship Between Organizational Justice And Psychological Empowerment," Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 25(25), pages 35-50, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:25:y:2019:i:25:p:35-50
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.soc.2019.V25-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/253
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.soc.2019.V25-04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:25:y:2019:i:25:p:35-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.