Author
Listed:
- Kerem Cenk YILMAZ
(Sakarya Ãœniversitesi)
- Deniz KÖKTAN
(Sakarya Ãœniversitesi)
Abstract
Prepared by an institution annually, Institutional Self-Evaluation Report (ISEP) is taken as a basis for external evaluation process performed at least once in five years and for annual internal evaluation monitoring of the Higher Education Institution and it is prepared in order to achieve required information for qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the Higher Education Institution by Higher Education Quality Council. ISEP process includes education and training, research and development, administrative system, quality assurance system, institutional information, result and evaluation processes. The departments of Turkish Folk Dances at Conservatories perform within the context of Quality Works of their universities. This study aims to establish the paths to follow in the process of quality by determining the situations of Turkish Folk Dances Departments of State Conservatories. It is an essential study for Turkish Folk Dance Departments in terms of assigning common references and being recognized in a universal framework. This study will determine the situation which is limited within the frame of mission and vision, lesson plans for eight semester, academic staff and matriculationconditionsthat scanned from the web sites of Ä°stanbul Technical UniversityTurkish Folk DanceDepartment, Ege UniversityTurkish Folk DanceDepartment, Sakarya UniversityStateConservatoryTurkish Folk DanceDepartment, Gaziantep UniversityTurkish Folk DanceDepartment, Giresun UniversityTurkish Folk DanceDepartment, Dicle UniversityTurkish Folk DanceDepartment.A model will be constituted by examining Sakarya University State Conservatory Turkish Folk Dance Department within the scope of Education of Internal Evaluation of the Institution (KÄ°DR) bargained by Council of Higher Education (YOK).Â
Suggested Citation
Kerem Cenk YILMAZ & Deniz KÖKTAN, 2017.
"A Consideration Between Departments Of Turkish Folk Dance In Terms Of Internal Evaluation Processes Within Quality Improvement Period,"
Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 16(16), pages 81-90, March.
Handle:
RePEc:eas:journl:v:16:y:2017:i:16:p:81-90
DOI: 10.17740/eas.soc.2017.V16-05
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:16:y:2017:i:16:p:81-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.