Author
Listed:
- Mehmet Sedat ERKAN
(Okan Ãœniversitesi)
Abstract
The occupation of Ä°zmir has an important place in Turkish history. It initiated the Turkish War of Independence and evoked the spirit of national struggle. What are the reasons and theses the Greeks put forth for their invasion of the city of Ä°zmir and thereon Western Anatolia? On what grounds did they consider themselves right? There are two reasons for the invasion of Izmir and the Western Anatolian Region, which they call Asia Minor, within the framework of Megali Idea (Great Idea)-the historical goal of the Greeks. First, these lands have been their homeland for over 3000 years. They are are mainly Greek land and under Turkish occupation. Secondly, there are more than two million Greek Cypriots here and these people who live under persecution must be rescued immediately. The Greek intellectuals who grew up with the ideas and thoughts of Megali Idea in time succeeded to create an effective movement with the support given by Britain, Russia and France, which aim to disintegrate the Ottoman Empire. The exaggerated and unsubstantiated reasons that Greece claimed were processed by Greek Prime Minister Elefterios Venizelos in open and clandestine negotiations during the First World War and a public opinion was created. The Ottoman Empire, which entered the First World War with Germany, Austria, Hungary and Bulgaria, was definitely defeated on October 29, 1918 together with its allies after bloody conflicts continued for as long as four years on the various fronts of the three continents. In the end, they had to sign the Mondros Armistice Agreement on October 30, 1918. At the Paris Peace Conference of the victorious states after the Mondros Armistice Agreement, a decision was made in favor of Greece on 5 May 1919 and the occupation of Ä°zmir was realized.Â
Suggested Citation
Mehmet Sedat ERKAN, 2017.
"The Reasons For Occupation Of Izmir According To Greek Claims,"
Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 15(15), pages 106-121, March.
Handle:
RePEc:eas:journl:v:15:y:2017:i:15:p:106-121
DOI: 10.17740/eas.soc.2017.V15-05
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:15:y:2017:i:15:p:106-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.