IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/journl/v12y2017i12p30-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving The Application Of Swot Analysis In Research Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Ergun DEMÄ°REL

    (Piri Reis University)

  • Dinçer BAYER

    (Piri Reis University)

Abstract

The research methods used in the physical sciences are generally based on quantitative analysis as social sciences use mostly qualitative analysis. As a result, research findings in the social sciences are rather subjective evaluations. To avoid the mistakes and misleading of subjective assessments different type of analytical methods are used in the social researches. Many researches in social sciences are classified as explanatory because it attempts to clarify why and how there is a relationship between two aspects of a situation or phenomenon. The exploratory research is carried out to investigate the possibilities of undertaking a particular research study which is also called as ‘feasibility’ or ‘pilot’ study. The SWOT method is commonly used in these types of research studies. The methodology of this study is based on the review of SWOT method applications in research and supported with a survey to define missing points and deficiencies in the existing master and doctorate theses. Then possible techniques to improve application of SWOT method in research studies are discussed and results are introduced. The outcome of study may provide useful information for the researchers who prefer use of SWOT method in their studies. This study may lead further studies on improvement of effective use of the research methods which may increase quality of research studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ergun DEMÄ°REL & Dinçer BAYER, 2017. "Improving The Application Of Swot Analysis In Research Studies," Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 12(12), pages 30-39, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:12:y:2017:i:12:p:30-39
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.soc.2017.V12-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/172
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.soc.2017.V12-03?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v:12:y:2017:i:12:p:30-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.