IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/econst/v16y2020i16p107-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Analysis Of Private Pension Companies In Turkey With Topsis Method (2018)

Author

Listed:
  • Ercan ÇALIÅž

    (Marmara Ãœniversitesi)

  • Ä°lknur KÃœLEKÇİ

    (Marmara Ãœniversitesi)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the performance of private pension / life and private pension companies operating in the insurance sector. Eight criteria have been determined for performance analysis of companies. These criteria are total premium, total assets, equity, pre-tax profit/loss, total debt, total reserve, total damage, current asset/short term debts. Eight criteria were used to analyze companies' performance. TOPSIS, which is a multi-criteria decision making method, and 2018 data of the companies included in the last published Insurance and PPS Annual Report were examined. According to the findings, the companies are ranked from the highest to the lowest performance value.

Suggested Citation

  • Ercan ÇALIÅž & Ä°lknur KÃœLEKÇİ, 2020. "Performance Analysis Of Private Pension Companies In Turkey With Topsis Method (2018)," Eurasian Eononometrics, Statistics and Emprical Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 16(16), pages 107-115, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eas:econst:v:16:y:2020:i:16:p:107-115
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.stat.2020-V16-07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/econstat/article/view/1007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.stat.2020-V16-07?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:econst:v:16:y:2020:i:16:p:107-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/econstat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.